Eva Götell

18 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Eva Götell
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 107
  • Conservation 53
  • Social Psychology 310
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 221
  • Music 43
Replace Hanne Mette Ochsner Ridder with:
Hanne Mette Ochsner Ridder Denmark
Anne W. Lipe United States
Édith Lecourt France
Lars Ole Bonde Denmark
Hans Petter Solli Norway
Robert E. Krout United States
Randi Rolvsjord Norway
Mercédès Pavlicevic United Kingdom
Jack Lane United Kingdom
Tammy Hopper Canada
Eva Götell relative to Hanne Mette Ochsner Ridder Denmark Hanne Mette Ochsner Ridder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hanne Mette Ochsner Ridder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Götell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Götell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Götell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Götell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Götell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Götell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Götell. The network helps show where Eva Götell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Eva Götell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Götell Line = papers co-authored together Eva Götell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200891
2 200351
3 201150
4 200249
5 201044
6 201837
7 200035
8 201023
9 200120
10 201119
11 200214
12 201011
13 201110
14 201110
15 201210
16 20157
17 20126
18 20125

About Eva Götell

Eva Götell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Therapy and Health (15 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (107 citations), Conservation (53 citations), Social Psychology (310 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (221 citations) and Music (43 citations). Eva Götell has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steven Brown, Sirkka‐Liisa Ekman, Gabriella Engström, Lena Marmstål Hammar, Azita Emami, Kendra Ray, Anne Söderlund, Petra von Heideken Wågert, Christine L. Williams and Caitlin R. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Nursing Research, The Arts in Psychotherapy, International Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact