Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
20001.2k citationsEtienne Schacht, Maria Cornelissen et al.profile →
In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers
Countries citing papers authored by Etienne Schacht
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Etienne Schacht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Etienne Schacht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Etienne Schacht more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Etienne Schacht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Etienne Schacht. The network helps show where Etienne Schacht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Etienne Schacht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Etienne Schacht.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Etienne Schacht based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Etienne Schacht. Etienne Schacht is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Desmet, Tim, Etienne Schacht, & Peter Dubruel. (2008). Rapid Prototyping as an elegant Production Tool for Polymeric Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: a review. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).9 indexed citations
Dubruel, Peter, Bart Christiaens, Berlinda Vanloo, et al.. (2003). Poly-L-glutamic acid derivatives as multifunctional vectors for gene delivery. Part B. Biological evaluation (vol 4, pg 1177, 2003). Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
10.
Dubruel, Peter & Etienne Schacht. (2001). Effect of a PEO block of graft on the properties of polymer-DNA complexes.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
11.
Huang, Yanming, et al.. (2001). Methylprednisolone coated stents decrease neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 104(17). 665–665.1 indexed citations
12.
Qiang, Beiping, et al.. (2001). Methylprednisolone coated stents decrease neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary model. European Heart Journal. 22. 483.3 indexed citations
13.
Schacht, Etienne, et al.. (2000). Synthetic polymers as vectors for gene delivery.. Polymer preprints. 1609–1610.2 indexed citations
14.
Schacht, Etienne, et al.. (1999). Polymeric prodrugs of antibiotics with improved efficiency. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
15.
Schacht, Etienne, et al.. (1999). Crosslinked gelatines for biomedical applications.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Wilczek, Krzysztof, Ivan De Scheerder, Luen-Fai Tam, et al.. (1996). Implantation of balloon expandable copper stents in porcine coronary arteries. A model for testing the efficacy of stent coating in decreasing stent thrombogenicity.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.