Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
- Journal
- Biomacromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bm990017d →Countries where authors are citing Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
This map shows the geographic impact of Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
This network shows the impact of Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels.
About Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by B. Bogdanov, Etienne Schacht, Maria Cornelissen and H. Berghmans covering the research area of Analytical Chemistry, Food Science and Molecular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (913 citations), Biomaterials (393 citations) and Automotive Engineering (274 citations). Published in Biomacromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bm990017d.