Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey
2020551 citationsEsteban Aucejo, Jacob French et al.Journal of Public Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Esteban Aucejo
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Esteban Aucejo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esteban Aucejo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esteban Aucejo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esteban Aucejo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esteban Aucejo. The network helps show where Esteban Aucejo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Esteban Aucejo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Esteban Aucejo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Esteban Aucejo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Esteban Aucejo. Esteban Aucejo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aucejo, Esteban, et al.. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Student Experiences and Expectations: Evidence from a Survey. Working Paper 27392.. National Bureau of Economic Research.3 indexed citations
8.
Aucejo, Esteban, et al.. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: Evidence from a survey. Journal of Public Economics. 191. 104271–104271.551 indexed citations breakdown →
Aucejo, Esteban, et al.. (2018). Teacher Effectiveness and Classroom Composition. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
Aucejo, Esteban, et al.. (2014). Assessing the Effect of School Days and Absences on Test Score Performance. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1302..1 indexed citations
15.
Aucejo, Esteban. (2013). Explaining Cross-Racial Differences in the Educational Gender Gap. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1220..2 indexed citations
16.
Arcidiacono, Peter, Esteban Aucejo, Andrew Hussey, & Kenneth I. Spenner. (2013). Racial Segregation Patterns in Selective Universities. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1219..2 indexed citations
17.
Arcidiacono, Peter, et al.. (2013). Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1224..3 indexed citations
Arcidiacono, Peter, Esteban Aucejo, Hanming Fang, & Kenneth I. Spenner. (2009). Does Affirmative Action Lead to Mismatch? A New Test and Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 14885.. National Bureau of Economic Research.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.