Ernest Mathijs
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Topics
- Cinema and Media Studies (9 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers)Media Studies and Communication (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Ernest Mathijs
26 papers receiving 171 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 77
- Economics and Econometrics 72
- Literature and Literary Theory 58
- Gender Studies 54
- Communication 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ernest Mathijs
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest Mathijs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest Mathijs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest Mathijs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest Mathijs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest Mathijs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest Mathijs. The network helps show where Ernest Mathijs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernest Mathijs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernest Mathijs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernest Mathijs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernest Mathijs. Ernest Mathijs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | The Cinema of David Cronenberg: From Baron of Blood to Cultural Hero | 3 |
| 4 | The Cult Film Reader | 11 |
| 5 | Our Methodological Challenges and Solutions | 4 |
| 6 | Watching «The Lord of the Rings»: Tolkien’s World Audiences | 18 |
| 7 | Watching the Lord of the rings | 5 |
| 8 | The Lord of the Rings : popular culture in global context | 34 |
| 9 | From Hobbits to Hollywood: Essays on Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings | 5 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Big Brother International : formats, critics and publics | 34 |
| 12 | Alternative Europe : eurotrash and exploitation cinema since 1945 | 5 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | Reel to Real: Film History in Pynchon's Vineland | 1 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Science and art : the red book of“Einstein meets Margritte" | 2 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Van daedalus tot pygmalion: Kunst en mimesis in het antropometrische stadium | 3 |
About Ernest Mathijs
Ernest Mathijs is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (9 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (52 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations). Ernest Mathijs has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Martin Barker, John Corner, Diederik Aerts and Jan Broekaert. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, Television & New Media and Screen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.