Beth Driscoll
Impact in
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literacy, Media, and Education
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Digital Games and Media 9
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 3
- Australian History and Society 3
-
- Themes in Literature Analysis 5
- Literacy, Media, and Education 2
- Co-authors
- DeNel Rehberg Sedo (2 shared papers)Claire Squires (9 shared papers)David Carter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Qualitative Inquiry (1 paper)The Journal of Popular Culture (1 paper)Creative Industries Journal (1 paper)Angelaki (1 paper)Publishing Research Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Beth Driscoll
26 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Literature and Literary Theory 89
- Gender Studies 65
- Medical Terminology 1
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
- Communication 24
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Driscoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Driscoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Driscoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Driscoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Driscoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Driscoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Driscoll. The network helps show where Beth Driscoll may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Beth Driscoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 2 | The New Literary Middlebrow: Tastemakers and Reading in the Twenty-First Century | 2014 | 30 |
| 3 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 11 | The Sleaze-O-Meter: Sexual Harassment in the Publishing Industry | 2018 | 6 |
| 12 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 14 | Megativity and Miniaturization at the Frankfurt Book Fair | 2020 | 4 |
| 15 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 |
About Beth Driscoll
Beth Driscoll is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Communication and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Australian History and Society (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (89 citations), Gender Studies (65 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations) and Communication (24 citations). Beth Driscoll has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include DeNel Rehberg Sedo, Claire Squires and David Carter. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, The Journal of Popular Culture, Creative Industries Journal, Angelaki and Publishing Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.