Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Expanding Gender Earnings Gap: Evidence from the LEHD-2000 Census
This map shows the geographic impact of Erling Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erling Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erling Barth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erling Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erling Barth. The network helps show where Erling Barth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erling Barth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erling Barth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erling Barth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erling Barth. Erling Barth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barth, Erling, Alex Bryson, & Harald Dale‐Olsen. (2017). Union Density, Productivity and Wages. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
7.
Barth, Erling, et al.. (2016). Sammenhengen mellom ferdigheter og arbeidsmarkedssituasjon for utsatte grupper. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
8.
Barth, Erling, et al.. (2015). New Social Risks and Welfare State Reforms in Norway and Spain. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Barth, Erling, et al.. (2013). Lønnsforskjeller mellom kvinner og menn : Hva har skjedd på 2000-tallet?. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).8 indexed citations
Asplund, Rita, et al.. (2011). Polarization of the Nordic Labour Markets. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 24(2). 25–48.17 indexed citations
13.
Bryson, Alex, Erling Barth, & Harald Dale‐Olsen. (2011). Do higher wages come at a price?. Journal of Economic Psychology. 33(1). 251–263.27 indexed citations
14.
Bryson, Alex, Harald Dale‐Olsen, & Erling Barth. (2009). How does innovation affect worker well-being?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).7 indexed citations
15.
Barth, Erling, Bernt Bratsberg, Torbjørn Hægeland, & Oddbjørn Raaum. (2009). Performance Pay and Within-Firm Wage Inequality. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
16.
Asplund, Rita & Erling Barth. (2005). Education and Wage Inequality in Europe. A Literature Review. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.15 indexed citations
17.
Barth, Erling, Trygve Gulbrandsen, & Pål Schøne. (2005). Family Ownership and Productivity: The Role of Owner-Management. SSRN Electronic Journal.21 indexed citations
18.
Barth, Erling, Bernt Bratsberg, Robin Naylor, & Oddbjørn Raaum. (2002). Explaining Variations in Wage Curves: Theory and Evidence. Econstor (Econstor).15 indexed citations
19.
Barth, Erling, et al.. (2001). 8. DO WE NEED ALL THAT HIGHER EDUCATION? EVIDENCE FROM 15 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 1.1 indexed citations
20.
Barth, Erling & Josef Zweimüller. (1993). Bargaining Regimes and Wage Dispersion. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.