Erik W. Cheries

453 citations
13 papers · 156 indexed · h-index 8

Erik W. Cheries

13 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Erik W. Cheries
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 102
  • Statistics and Probability 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
  • Social Psychology 44
Replace Claudia Kubicek with:
Claudia Kubicek Germany
Layla Unger United States
Katie Wagner United States
Megumi Kuwabara United States
Maayan Stavans United States
Emily Mather United Kingdom
Katherine E. Twomey United Kingdom
Romariz da Silva Barros Brazil
Jon‐Fan Hu Taiwan
Erik W. Cheries relative to Claudia Kubicek Germany Claudia Kubicek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Claudia Kubicek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik W. Cheries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik W. Cheries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik W. Cheries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik W. Cheries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik W. Cheries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik W. Cheries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik W. Cheries. The network helps show where Erik W. Cheries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Erik W. Cheries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik W. Cheries Line = papers co-authored together Erik W. Cheries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 202110
2 20195
3 20199
4 20194
5 201811
6 201710
7 20164
8 20103
9
Do the same principles constrain persisting object representations in infant cognition and adult perception?: The cases of continuity and cohesion
20099
10 200853
11 200623
12 200614
13 20051

About Erik W. Cheries

Erik W. Cheries is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Developmental Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (10 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (2 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (102 citations), Statistics and Probability (36 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Erik W. Cheries has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Scholl, Karen Wynn, Stephen R. Mitroff, Laurie R. Santos, Ashley Lyons, George E. Newman, Carolyn M. Palmquist, Elizabeth M. Jakob, Kyle R. Cave and Jessica Brian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Developmental Science, Perception, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026