Malte Schott

1.0k citations
6 papers · 731 indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 4

Malte Schott

6 papers receiving 715 citations

Hit Papers

Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation te...2752011202620162021100200300400

Peers

Malte Schott
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Applied Psychology 107
  • General Decision Sciences 32
  • Social Psychology 337
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 136
  • Sociology and Political Science 367
Replace Amanda Williams with:
Amanda Williams Canada
Mike Morrison United States
Jill M. Leibold United States
Aaron C. Weidman United States
Nadav Klein United States
J. P. Gerber Australia
Zoe Kinias United States
Helen C. Boucher United States
Mirosław Kofta Poland
Anca M. Miron United States
Malte Schott relative to Amanda Williams Canada Amanda Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Amanda Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malte Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malte Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malte Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malte Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malte Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malte Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malte Schott. The network helps show where Malte Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Malte Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malte Schott Line = papers co-authored together Malte Schott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 20193
2 201914
3 20184
4
Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests – An analysis of articles published in 2015breakdown →
2017275
5
What mediation analysis can (not) dobreakdown →
2011433
6 19942

About Malte Schott

Malte Schott is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Communication, Statistics and Probability, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (107 citations), General Decision Sciences (32 citations), Social Psychology (337 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (367 citations). Malte Schott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Fiedler, Thorsten Meiser, Chris Harris, Florian Kutzner, Mandy Hütter, Markolf H. Niemz, André Mata, Myrto Pantazi, Yaakov Kareev and Mário B. Ferreira. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Social Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026