Erica Longfellow

439 total citations
5 papers, 94 citations indexed

About

Erica Longfellow is a scholar working on History, Religious studies and Classics. According to data from OpenAlex, Erica Longfellow has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 94 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in History, 2 papers in Religious studies and 1 paper in Classics. Recurrent topics in Erica Longfellow's work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper). Erica Longfellow is often cited by papers focused on Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper). Erica Longfellow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Erica Longfellow's co-authors include Linda Burke and Steve May and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching in Higher Education, Journal of British Studies and Gender & History.

In The Last Decade

Erica Longfellow

4 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers

Erica Longfellow
Rosalind Smith Australia
M. O. Grenby United Kingdom
James Morwood United Kingdom
Leah Shopkow United States
E. L. G. Stones United Kingdom
May McKisack United Kingdom
Robert McColl Millar United Kingdom
Rosalind Smith Australia
Erica Longfellow
Citations per year, relative to Erica Longfellow Erica Longfellow (= 1×) peers Rosalind Smith

Countries citing papers authored by Erica Longfellow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erica Longfellow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erica Longfellow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erica Longfellow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erica Longfellow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erica Longfellow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erica Longfellow. The network helps show where Erica Longfellow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erica Longfellow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erica Longfellow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erica Longfellow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erica Longfellow. Erica Longfellow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
1.
Longfellow, Erica, et al.. (2008). ‘They had a way of helping that actually helped’: a case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme. Teaching in Higher Education. 13(1). 93–105. 61 indexed citations
2.
Longfellow, Erica. (2006). Public, Private, and the Household in Early Seventeenth-Century England. Journal of British Studies. 45(2). 313–334. 14 indexed citations
3.
Longfellow, Erica. (2006). Early Modern Women’s Writing in 2005. Literature Compass. 3(4). 792–803. 2 indexed citations
4.
Longfellow, Erica. (2004). Women and Religious Writing in Early Modern England. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations
5.
Longfellow, Erica. (2002). Eliza’s Babes: Poetry ‘Proceeding from Divinity’ in Seventeenth–Century England. Gender & History. 14(2). 242–265.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026