Eric Harwit
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- E-Government and Public Services
- Asian Industrial and Economic Development
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Global trade and economics 4
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 7
- Asian Industrial and Economic Development 4
- Co-authors
- D Clark (1 shared paper)Samuel P. S. Ho (2 shared papers)Oded Shenkar (1 shared paper)Mike W. Peng (1 shared paper)Yadong Luo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Asian Survey (4 papers)Pacific Affairs (3 papers)The China Quarterly (3 papers)Chinese Journal of Communication (2 papers)The Pacific Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Eric Harwit
23 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Communication 128
- Political Science and International Relations 231
- Media Technology 75
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 65
- Strategy and Management 114
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Harwit
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Harwit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Harwit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Harwit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Harwit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Harwit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Harwit. The network helps show where Eric Harwit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Eric Harwit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 38 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3 |
About Eric Harwit
Eric Harwit is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Media Technology, Communication and Development, having authored 25 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (128 citations), Political Science and International Relations (231 citations), Media Technology (75 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (65 citations) and Strategy and Management (114 citations). Eric Harwit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Israel. Frequent co-authors include D Clark, Samuel P. S. Ho, Oded Shenkar, Mike W. Peng and Yadong Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, Pacific Affairs, The China Quarterly, Chinese Journal of Communication and The Pacific Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.