The Pacific Review

1.2k papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in The Pacific Review in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in The Pacific Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (745 papers), Sociology and Political Science (586 papers) and Development (330 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (330 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (324 papers) and Global trade and economics (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Pacific Review are Richard Stubbs, Amitav Acharya, Yong Wang, Duncan McCargo, Takashi Terada, John Ravenhill, Linda Weiss, Garry Rodan, Kevin Hewison and Shaun Narine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Pacific Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Pacific Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Pacific Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Pacific Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Pacific Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Pacific Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Pacific Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025