Chinese Journal of Communication

471 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 471 papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication usually cover Sociology and Political Science (270 papers), Communication (204 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (101 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (136 papers), Media Studies and Communication (99 papers) and Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Communication are Guolin Shen, Ping Sun, Eric Harwit, Colin Sparks, Louis Leung, Jean‐Christophe Plantin, Gabriele de Seta, Francis Lee, Herman Wasserman and Michael Curtin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025