Eneet Kaur

485 citations
21 papers · 251 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Eneet Kaur

17 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers

Eneet Kaur
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Artificial Intelligence 227
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 182
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 24
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 19
  • Mathematical Physics 7
Replace Felix Leditzky with:
Felix Leditzky United States
Rui Soares Barbosa United Kingdom
Seyed Javad Akhtarshenas Iran
Christopher Hadley United Kingdom
Mirjam Weilenmann Austria
Koon Tong Goh Singapore
Jonas Helsen Netherlands
Bobak T. Kiani United States
Tzyh Haur Yang Singapore
Eneet Kaur relative to Felix Leditzky United States Felix Leditzky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Felix Leditzky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eneet Kaur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eneet Kaur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eneet Kaur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eneet Kaur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eneet Kaur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eneet Kaur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eneet Kaur. The network helps show where Eneet Kaur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Eneet Kaur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eneet Kaur Line = papers co-authored together Eneet Kaur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201861
2 202051
3 202130
4 201919
5 202418
6 201717
7 201716
8 202113
9 20228
10 20194
11 20234
12 20233
13 20252
14 20202
15 20241
16 20251
17 20241
18 20250
19 20250
20 20250

About Eneet Kaur

Eneet Kaur is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Information Systems, Biomedical Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 21 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (18 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (15 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (12 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (2 papers), Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks (2 papers), Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (1 paper), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (1 paper) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (227 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (182 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (24 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (19 citations) and Mathematical Physics (7 citations). Eneet Kaur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mark M. Wilde, Nilanjana Datta, Felix Leditzky, Mario Berta, Christoph Hirche, Saikat Guha, Siddhartha Das, Andreas Winter, Yihui Quek and Xiaoting Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. A, Physical Review Applied, Quantum, IEEE Network and Letters in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact