Jonas Helsen

609 citations
21 papers · 356 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Helsen

19 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Jonas Helsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 261
  • Artificial Intelligence 259
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 106
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 27
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1
Replace Stasja Stanisic with:
Stasja Stanisic United Kingdom
Naomi Nickerson United Kingdom
D. P. Nadlinger United Kingdom
Xingyao Wu Singapore
Zhenyu Cai United Kingdom
Felix Leditzky United States
Giulia Ferrini France
Shraddha Singh United States
Francesco Arzani France
Marius Nagy Canada
Jonas Helsen relative to Stasja Stanisic United Kingdom Stasja Stanisic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Stasja Stanisic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Helsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Helsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Helsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Helsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Helsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Helsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Helsen. The network helps show where Jonas Helsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Helsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Helsen Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Helsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201975
2 202265
3 202348
4 201828
5 202225
6 202017
7 202316
8 201815
9 202314
10 202313
11 201911
12 20238
13 20226
14 20206
15 20224
16 20192
17 20261
18 20251
19 20191
20 20260

About Jonas Helsen

Jonas Helsen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 21 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (14 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (3 papers), Quantum many-body systems (2 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (261 citations), Artificial Intelligence (259 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (106 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (27 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1 citation). Jonas Helsen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie Wehner, Ingo Roth, Albert H. Werner, Jens Eisert, S. N. Coppersmith, M. A. Eriksson, Thomas F. Watson, Daniel R. Ward, Lieven M. K. Vandersypen and D. E. Savage. Their work appears in journals such as Quantum, Physical review. A, Nature Communications, Physical Review X and Physical Review B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact