Quantum

1.3k papers and 18.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Quantum in the last decades have received a total of 18.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Quantum usually cover Artificial Intelligence (1.1k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (902 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (169 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Information and Cryptography (915 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (867 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (401 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quantum are John Preskill, Craig Gidney, Nathan Killoran, Josh Izaac, Patrick J. Coles, Daniel Litinski, Daochen Wang, Stephen Brierley, Joseph Bowles and Ivan Šupić.

In The Last Decade

Quantum

1.1k papers receiving 17.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Quantum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quantum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quantum.

Countries where authors publish in Quantum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quantum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quantum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantum more than expected).

Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond 2018 2026 2020 2023 3.9k
  1. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond (2018)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026