Anna Schliehe
Impact in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Sex work and related issues
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Homelessness and Social Issues
Papers in
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 13
-
- Urban Planning and Governance 3
- Co-authors
- Dominique MoranJennifer TurnerBen CreweJulie LaursenKristian MjålandTom DisneyAlice IevinsAlistair Fraser
- Journals
- European Journal of Criminology (3 papers)The British Journal of Criminology (3 papers)Progress in Human Geography (2 papers)Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (2 papers)Qualitative Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyDenmark
In The Last Decade
Anna Schliehe
18 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 302
- General Health Professions 162
- Clinical Psychology 113
- Geography, Planning and Development 27
- Urban Studies 18
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schliehe
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schliehe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schliehe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schliehe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schliehe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schliehe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schliehe. The network helps show where Anna Schliehe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schliehe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 144 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 29 |
About Anna Schliehe
Anna Schliehe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Demography, having authored 21 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (302 citations), General Health Professions (162 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (27 citations) and Urban Studies (18 citations). Anna Schliehe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Moran, Jennifer Turner, Ben Crewe, Julie Laursen, Kristian Mjåland, Tom Disney, Alice Ievins, Alistair Fraser, Chris Philo and Giovanni La Penna. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Criminology, The British Journal of Criminology, Progress in Human Geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers and Qualitative Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.