Natalie Osborne
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Transportation top 10%
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Deanna Grant‐SmithSue JacksonFrancis MarkhamTony MatthewsE. MorganProsper Issahaku KorahBrendan MackeyCaryl Bosman
- Topics
- Urban Planning and Governance (7 papers)Water Governance and Infrastructure (6 papers)Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaLand Use PolicyEnvironmental Science & Policy
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Natalie Osborne
30 papers receiving 476 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 192
- Political Science and International Relations 85
- Global and Planetary Change 81
- Transportation 60
- Urban Studies 59
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Osborne
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Osborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Osborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Osborne. The network helps show where Natalie Osborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Osborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Osborne. Natalie Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | What ongoing staff can do to support precariously employed colleagues | 2 |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | Resisting the 'employability' doctrine through anarchist pedagogies and prefiguration | 13 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Natalie Osborne
Natalie Osborne is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Geography, Planning and Development and Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (7 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (6 papers) and Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (59 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (53 citations) and Transportation (60 citations). Natalie Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Deanna Grant‐Smith, Sue Jackson, Francis Markham, Tony Matthews, E. Morgan, Prosper Issahaku Korah, Brendan Mackey, Caryl Bosman, Martin F. Breed and Emily J. Flies. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Land Use Policy and Environmental Science & Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.