Jane Farmer

6.0k total citations
207 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

Jane Farmer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Farmer has authored 207 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in General Health Professions, 44 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 31 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jane Farmer's work include Global Health Workforce Issues (43 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (27 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers). Jane Farmer is often cited by papers focused on Global Health Workforce Issues (43 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (27 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers). Jane Farmer collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Jane Farmer's co-authors include Amanda Kenny, Artur Steiner, Sarah‐Anne Muñoz, R.W. Pekala, Virginia Dickson‐Swift, T. D. Tran, S.T. Mayer, R. J. Anderson, J. Miller and Cynthia T. Alviso and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Jane Farmer

194 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Jane Farmer 1.5k 621 528 461 371 207 4.3k
Peter May 526 0.3× 133 0.2× 1.5k 2.9× 1.9k 4.2× 445 1.2× 172 8.0k
Liang-Chia Chen 1.8k 1.2× 129 0.2× 584 1.1× 180 0.4× 334 0.9× 233 7.3k
François Béland 2.2k 1.4× 87 0.1× 731 1.4× 1.4k 3.1× 354 1.0× 246 8.1k
Abdallah S. Daar 767 0.5× 89 0.1× 360 0.7× 291 0.6× 75 0.2× 201 5.6k
Andrew J. Epstein 1.2k 0.8× 131 0.2× 44 0.1× 444 1.0× 1.3k 3.6× 212 7.8k
Hugh Barr 4.0k 2.7× 369 0.6× 196 0.4× 294 0.6× 161 0.4× 253 11.1k
David Perkins 1.2k 0.8× 328 0.5× 336 0.6× 121 0.3× 17 0.0× 163 4.2k
Michael S. Spencer 1.5k 1.0× 52 0.1× 1.7k 3.1× 2.2k 4.9× 128 0.3× 185 8.0k
Charles E. Cunningham 906 0.6× 43 0.1× 384 0.7× 658 1.4× 96 0.3× 197 9.0k
Richard D Neal 1.7k 1.2× 234 0.4× 366 0.7× 311 0.7× 70 0.2× 221 7.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Farmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Farmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Farmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Farmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Farmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Farmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Farmer. The network helps show where Jane Farmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Farmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Farmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Farmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Farmer. Jane Farmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Karg, Adam, et al.. (2025). Affective Judgement of a Sense of Social Connection: A Scale Refinement Process. Social Indicators Research. 179(1). 399–421.
2.
Steiner, Artur & Jane Farmer. (2024). Contemporary interventions tackling complex issues: Exploring pathways from online mental health forums to personal resilience. Journal of Rural Studies. 110. 103379–103379. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kilpatrick, Sue, Jane Farmer, Sherridan Emery, et al.. (2023). Community transformed? Exploring the interaction between online support and rural community life for people with acute mental health conditions. Journal of Rural Studies. 99. 167–175. 5 indexed citations
4.
5.
Albury, Kath, et al.. (2021). Data for Good Collaboration: Research report. Figshare. 2 indexed citations
6.
Kilpatrick, Sue, et al.. (2021). Social enterprises and regional cities: working together for mutual benefit. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 33(9-10). 741–757. 11 indexed citations
7.
Farmer, Jane, et al.. (2021). Community co‐produced mental health initiatives in rural Australia: A scoping review. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 29(6). 865–878. 9 indexed citations
8.
Kilpatrick, Sue, et al.. (2020). Social enterprises developing capability and well-being through work-based learning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 74(3). 394–414. 2 indexed citations
9.
McCosker, Anthony, et al.. (2020). Social media for social good? A thematic, spatial and visual analysis of humanitarian action on Instagram. Information Communication & Society. 24(13). 1870–1890. 17 indexed citations
10.
Farmer, Jane, et al.. (2019). How Work Integration Social Enterprises Help to Realize Capability: A Comparison of Three Australian Settings. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 12(1). 87–109. 9 indexed citations
11.
Farmer, Jane, et al.. (2019). Integration and segregation for social enterprise employees: A relational micro‐geography. Area. 52(1). 176–186. 8 indexed citations
12.
Barraket, Jo, et al.. (2019). An Organizational Approach to Understanding How Social Enterprises Address Health Inequities: A Scoping Review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 11(3). 257–281. 19 indexed citations
13.
Preston, Robyn, Sarah Larkins, Karla Canuto, et al.. (2019). How and why do participatory women’s groups (PWGs) improve the quality of maternal and child health (MCH) care? A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 9(9). e030461–e030461. 9 indexed citations
14.
Carlisle, Karen, Jane Farmer, Judy Taylor, Sarah Larkins, & Rebecca Evans. (2018). Evaluating community participation: A comparison of participatory approaches in the planning and implementation of new primary health‐care services in northern Australia. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 33(3). 704–722. 21 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, Judy, Karen Carlisle, Jane Farmer, et al.. (2017). Implementation of oral health initiatives by Australian rural communities: Factors for success. Health & Social Care in the Community. 26(1). e102–e110. 9 indexed citations
16.
Kiger, Alice, Janet Tucker, Helen Bryers, et al.. (2014). Sustainable Maternity Service Provision in Remote and Rural Areas of Scotland: The scoping of core multidisciplinary skills and exploration of best practice in the development and maintenance of skills - Executive Summary. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling).
17.
Farmer, Jane, et al.. (2007). Neutron-Absorbing Coatings for Safe Storage of Fissile Materials with Enhanced Shielding & Criticality Safety. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 7 indexed citations
18.
Iversen, Lisa, et al.. (2003). Medical students' orientation towards rural general practice: results from an exploratory study of a Scottish cohort. Education for Primary Care. 14. 463–467. 4 indexed citations
19.
Farmer, Jane, et al.. (2001). Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.. PubMed. 51(467). 486–91. 52 indexed citations
20.
Summers, L., et al.. (1995). Multilayer Thermoelectric Films: A Strategy for the Enhancement of Zt. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026