Sarah King

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Sarah King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah King has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah King's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Marine and fisheries research (6 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers). Sarah King is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Marine and fisheries research (6 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers). Sarah King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Sarah King's co-authors include Mary J. Renfrew, Felicia McCormick, Theresa M. Marteau, Gareth J Hollands, Angela Wade, William P. Jordan, A Toby Prevost, David French, Stephen Sutton and Simon J. Griffin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Sarah King

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis

2016 338 citations Gareth J Hollands, David French et al. BMJ profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah King United Kingdom	23	636	627	412	357	304	59	2.5k
Jon Genuneit Germany	40	546 0.9×	512 0.8×	191 0.5×	218 0.6×	462 1.5×	177	5.9k
David J. Hill Australia	56	532 0.8×	702 1.1×	427 1.0×	311 0.9×	326 1.1×	165	8.4k
Amanda L. Thompson United States	29	640 1.0×	1.0k 1.7×	568 1.4×	337 0.9×	688 2.3×	92	3.7k
Jane Coad United Kingdom	35	360 0.6×	750 1.2×	164 0.4×	521 1.5×	629 2.1×	187	4.1k
Sheila Gahagan United States	31	399 0.6×	1.0k 1.6×	269 0.7×	525 1.5×	323 1.1×	151	3.0k
Won S. Choi United States	36	457 0.7×	1.4k 2.3×	211 0.5×	819 2.3×	149 0.5×	152	5.0k
J. A. Swift United Kingdom	27	325 0.5×	1.3k 2.1×	417 1.0×	573 1.6×	344 1.1×	60	2.9k
Jing Jin China	35	336 0.5×	1.0k 1.6×	547 1.3×	239 0.7×	286 0.9×	237	4.2k
Syed Hasan Arshad United Kingdom	53	690 1.1×	705 1.1×	388 0.9×	158 0.4×	377 1.2×	277	10.2k
Emma K. Larkin United States	39	646 1.0×	415 0.7×	178 0.4×	235 0.7×	101 0.3×	105	5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah King. The network helps show where Sarah King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah King. Sarah King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

King, Sarah, et al.. (2023). A systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of azelaic acid in the management of acne, rosacea, melasma and skin aging. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 22(10). 2650–2662. 16 indexed citations

Gallandat, Karin, et al.. (2023). Risk factors for food contamination among children discharged from community management of acute malnutrition programmes in South Sudan: A cross‐sectional study and hazard analysis critical control point approach. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 20(2). e13612–e13612. 2 indexed citations

Kelly, Sarah, Patrick Redmond, Sarah King, et al.. (2020). Training in the use of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring with cardiotocography: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 128(9). 1408–1419. 16 indexed citations

Hollands, Gareth J, Patrice Carter, Sarah King, et al.. (2019). Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(9). 73 indexed citations

King, Sarah, et al.. (2019). Comparison of Temporal Bone Parameters before Cochlear Implantation in Patients with and without Facial Nerve Stimulation. Journal of Audiology & Otology. 23(4). 193–196. 5 indexed citations

Crockett, Rachel A., Sarah King, Theresa M. Marteau, et al.. (2018). Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(6). CD009315–CD009315. 172 indexed citations

Miani, Céline, Adam Martin, Josephine Exley, et al.. (2017). Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter duration (3-month vs. 28-day) prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions: systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technology Assessment. 21(78). 1–128. 16 indexed citations

Winpenny, Eleanor, Céline Miani, Emma Pitchforth, Sarah King, & Martín Roland. (2016). Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services: a scoping review of interventions at the primary–secondary care interface. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 22(1). 53–64. 33 indexed citations

Stautz, Kaidy, et al.. (2016). Immediate effects of alcohol marketing communications and media portrayals on consumption and cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. BMC Public Health. 16(1). 465–465. 46 indexed citations

10.

Hollands, Gareth J, David French, Simon J. Griffin, et al.. (2016). The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ. 352. i1102–i1102. 338 indexed citations breakdown →

11.

Winpenny, Eleanor, Céline Miani, Emma Pitchforth, et al.. (2016). Outpatient services and primary care: scoping review, substudies and international comparisons. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(15). 1–290. 25 indexed citations

12.

King, Sarah, Julie Glanville, Mary Ellen Sanders, Anita Fitzgerald, & Danielle Varley. (2014). Effectiveness of probiotics on the duration of illness in healthy children and adults who develop common acute respiratory infectious conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal Of Nutrition. 112(1). 41–54. 186 indexed citations

13.

King, Sarah, et al.. (2014). The Health Risks of Bathing in Recreational Waters: A Rapid Evidence Assessment of Water Quality and Gastrointestinal Illness. RAND Corporation eBooks. 4(4). 5–5. 13 indexed citations

14.

King, Sarah, et al.. (2012). Blended Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Case Study of How Professors Make It Happen. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 25(1). 44–59. 37 indexed citations

15.

Firszt, Jill B., et al.. (2012). Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 33(4). 521–533. 124 indexed citations

16.

King, Sarah, Jill B. Firszt, Ruth M. Reeder, Laura K. Holden, & Michael Strube. (2012). Evaluation of TIMIT Sentence List Equivalency with Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 23(5). 313–331. 17 indexed citations

17.

Bochenek, Eleanor A., et al.. (2010). Evaluating Catch, Effort, and Bag Limits on Directed Trips in the Recreational Summer Flounder Party Boat Fishery. Marine and Coastal Fisheries. 2(1). 412–423. 10 indexed citations

18.

Renfrew, Mary J., Lisa Dyson, Felicia McCormick, et al.. (2009). Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review. Child Care Health and Development. 36(2). 165–178. 63 indexed citations

19.

King, Sarah. (2007). Evaluation of sentence list equivalency for the TIMIT sentences by cochlear implant recipients. Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine). 2 indexed citations

20.

King, Sarah, Susan Griffin, Z. Hodges, et al.. (2006). A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate, dexamfetamine and atomoxetine for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Health Technology Assessment. 10(23). iii–iv, xiii. 133 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact