Jo Parsons
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 3
-
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation 4
- Co-authors
- Helen Atherton (11 shared papers)Carol Bryce (4 shared papers)Katie Newby (5 shared papers)Sarah Griffiths (2 shared papers)Emily Fulton (2 shared papers)Katherine Brown (2 shared papers)Ildikó Tombor (1 shared paper)Felix Naughton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (5 papers)Digital Health (3 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)Family Practice (2 papers)Midwifery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jo Parsons
30 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Applied Psychology 53
- Health 62
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
- General Health Professions 104
- Conservation 11
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Parsons
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Parsons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Parsons
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Parsons. The network helps show where Jo Parsons may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Parsons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 |
About Jo Parsons
Jo Parsons is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (9 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (6 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (53 citations), Health (62 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations), General Health Professions (104 citations) and Conservation (11 citations). Jo Parsons has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Atherton, Carol Bryce, Katie Newby, Sarah Griffiths, Emily Fulton, Katherine Brown, Ildikó Tombor, Felix Naughton, Jeremy Dale and David French. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Digital Health, BMJ Open, Family Practice and Midwifery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.