Emma Jaspaert
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Geert VervaekeSebastian Egger-LamplVana HutterLisanne KleygreweMarie Ottilie FrenkelLaura GiessingRaôul R. D. OudejansHenning Plessner
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumAustriaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Emma Jaspaert
10 papers receiving 214 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 72
- Clinical Psychology 67
- Health 57
- Political Science and International Relations 56
- Social Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Jaspaert
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Jaspaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Jaspaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Jaspaert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Jaspaert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Jaspaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Jaspaert. The network helps show where Emma Jaspaert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Jaspaert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Jaspaert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Jaspaert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Jaspaert. Emma Jaspaert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | Mapping Demands: How to Prepare Police Officers to Cope with Pandemic-Specific Stressors | 3 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 113 | |
| 6 | A Virtual Platform to Train Cross-National Police Teams in Team Collaboration and Police-Interviewing | 3 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Motivatie voor gedragsinterventies bij jeugdige justitiabelen | 0 |
About Emma Jaspaert
Emma Jaspaert is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (57 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Emma Jaspaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Geert Vervaeke, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Vana Hutter, Lisanne Kleygrewe, Marie Ottilie Frenkel, Laura Giessing, Raôul R. D. Oudejans, Henning Plessner, Helmut Schrom-Feiertag and Manfred Tscheligi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Criminal Justice and Journal of Family Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.