Emma Jaspaert

410 total citations
11 papers, 229 citations indexed

About

Emma Jaspaert is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Jaspaert has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 229 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emma Jaspaert's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers). Emma Jaspaert is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers). Emma Jaspaert collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Austria and Netherlands. Emma Jaspaert's co-authors include Geert Vervaeke, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, Vana Hutter, Lisanne Kleygrewe, Marie Ottilie Frenkel, Laura Giessing, Raôul R. D. Oudejans, Henning Plessner, Helmut Schrom-Feiertag and Manfred Tscheligi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Criminal Justice and Journal of Family Violence.

In The Last Decade

Emma Jaspaert

10 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Jaspaert Belgium	5	72	67	57	56	56	11	229
Lisanne Kleygrewe Netherlands	6	57 0.8×	50 0.7×	13 0.2×	69 1.2×	51 0.9×	8	221
Sebastian Egger-Lampl Austria	6	56 0.8×	62 0.9×	14 0.2×	54 1.0×	29 0.5×	16	220
Mo Ray United Kingdom	9	59 0.8×	35 0.5×	44 0.8×	19 0.3×	31 0.6×	37	300
Liam O’Sullivan Ireland	9	101 1.4×	89 1.3×	25 0.4×	50 0.9×	15 0.3×	30	315
Annika Taghizadeh Larsson Sweden	9	66 0.9×	64 1.0×	49 0.9×	24 0.4×	22 0.4×	33	386
Mario S. Staller Germany	10	128 1.8×	42 0.6×	36 0.6×	123 2.2×	56 1.0×	49	292
Ajima Olaghere United States	11	141 2.0×	101 1.5×	45 0.8×	33 0.6×	39 0.7×	23	238
Siyu Liu China	10	180 2.5×	135 2.0×	26 0.5×	61 1.1×	26 0.5×	51	321
Matthew L. Long United Kingdom	8	176 2.4×	174 2.6×	26 0.5×	20 0.4×	45 0.8×	10	294

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Jaspaert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Jaspaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Jaspaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Jaspaert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Jaspaert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Jaspaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Jaspaert. The network helps show where Emma Jaspaert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Jaspaert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Jaspaert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Jaspaert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Jaspaert. Emma Jaspaert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2024). CoLEBricks: Co-Designing Virtual Reality Scenarios with Generative Building Blocks. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1–5. 1 indexed citations

Kleygrewe, Lisanne, et al.. (2023). Enhancing Operational Police Training in High Stress Situations with Virtual Reality: Experiences, Tools and Guidelines. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 7(2). 14–14. 25 indexed citations

Frenkel, Marie Ottilie, Laura Giessing, Emma Jaspaert, & Mario S. Staller. (2021). Mapping Demands: How to Prepare Police Officers to Cope with Pandemic-Specific Stressors. Lirias. 11–22. 3 indexed citations

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2021). CBRNe Training in Virtual Environments: SWOT Analysis & Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 11(4). 295–303. 18 indexed citations

Frenkel, Marie Ottilie, Laura Giessing, Sebastian Egger-Lampl, et al.. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on European police officers: Stress, demands, and coping resources. Journal of Criminal Justice. 72. 101756–101756. 113 indexed citations

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2019). A Virtual Platform to Train Cross-National Police Teams in Team Collaboration and Police-Interviewing. Lirias (KU Leuven). 167–175. 3 indexed citations

Jaspaert, Emma. (2015). A dyadic analysis of the role of preference disconfirmation in the explanation of intimate partner violence. 1 indexed citations

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2015). Social Desirability in Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Satisfaction Reports: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 32(9). 1401–1420. 54 indexed citations

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2015). SCAN as an investigative tool. Police Practice and Research. 17(3). 279–293. 9 indexed citations

10.

Jaspaert, Emma & Geert Vervaeke. (2014). Exploring the Indirect Effect of Preference Discrepancy on Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Family Violence. 29(8). 829–837. 2 indexed citations

11.

Jaspaert, Emma, et al.. (2009). Motivatie voor gedragsinterventies bij jeugdige justitiabelen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact