Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins

22 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 100
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 96
  • Clinical Psychology 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 73
  • General Health Professions 57
Replace Susanne Landorph with:
Susanne Landorph Denmark
Jacqueline M. T. Henderson New Zealand
Elena Guida Italy
Sheri A. Della Grotta United States
Arlene M. McGarty United Kingdom
Anne Mari Torgersen Norway
E. Andrew Pitchford United States
Gabriela M. Hungerford United States
Inge Glazemakers Belgium
Nathalie Franc France
Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins relative to Susanne Landorph Denmark Susanne Landorph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Susanne Landorph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins. The network helps show where Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins. Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 2
4 8
5 1
6 0
7 8
8 15
9 1
10 13
11 6
12 11
13 76
14 10
15 7
16 9
17 21
18 8
19
Helping Our Toddlers, Developing Our Children's Skills (HOT DOCS): A Problem-Solving Approach for Parents of Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
3
20 27

About Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins

Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (8 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (100 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (73 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (29 citations). Emily Shaffer‐Hudkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen Armstrong, Denise Maguire, Heather Agazzi, Kathy L. Bradley‐Klug, Heewon L. Gray, Shannon M. Suldo, Acadia W. Buro, Alicia D. Monroe, Abraham Salinas‐Miranda and Sweta Sinha. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Journal of School Health and Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026