Emily Murphy

36 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Emily Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 135
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 258
  • General Health Professions 157
  • Dermatology 44
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 75
Replace Alison Black with:
Alison Black United Kingdom
David L. Coulter United States
Charles Hendry United Kingdom
Leena Salminen Finland
Helen Keane Australia
Ella McLafferty United Kingdom
Yael Benn United Kingdom
Rebecca Brown United Kingdom
W. Gill Woodall United States
Stephen Fallows United Kingdom
Emily Murphy relative to Alison Black United Kingdom Alison Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Alison Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Murphy. The network helps show where Emily Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Emily Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009133
2 2009108
3 2010101
4 201994
5 200174
6 201263
7 201557
8 201732
9 200929
10 201926
11 202119
12 201419
13
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Cannabinoids in the Dermatology Community
201819
14 201518
15 201318
16 200715
17 202010
18 20209
19 20189
20 20179

About Emily Murphy

Emily Murphy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Dermatology and Education, having authored 40 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (135 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (258 citations), General Health Professions (157 citations), Dermatology (44 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (75 citations). Emily Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Adam Friedman, William A. Neal, Daniel Oesch, David Donley, Rachel Yeater, Christine Baylis, Valerie Minor, Christa Ice, Lesley Cottrell and Marianna Noale. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, Health Expectations, Higher Education Quarterly, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility and World Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact