Lee A. Pyles

52 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

Lee A. Pyles
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Developmental Neuroscience 31
  • Epidemiology 264
  • Health Information Management 16
  • Emergency Medicine 17
  • Internal Medicine 7
Replace Eugene Moretti with:
Eugene Moretti United States
Rob Spanjersberg Netherlands
Mark David Twite United States
Martin W. Allard United States
Isabelle Spahr‐Schopfer Canada
Angus I. McEwan United Kingdom
Theresa Mikhailov United States
Inger Marie Drage Norway
Elizabeth Vickers Saarel United States
Suely Pereira Zeferino Brazil
Lee A. Pyles relative to Eugene Moretti United States Eugene Moretti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Eugene Moretti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lee A. Pyles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee A. Pyles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee A. Pyles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee A. Pyles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee A. Pyles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee A. Pyles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee A. Pyles. The network helps show where Lee A. Pyles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lee A. Pyles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lee A. Pyles Line = papers co-authored together Lee A. Pyles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200779
2 201072
3 200857
4 202054
5 199948
6 199344
7 199038
8 199537
9 201937
10 200829
11 200228
12 200522
13 199219
14 199018
15 201717
16 200415
17 200914
18 201514
19 202113
20 201012

About Lee A. Pyles

Lee A. Pyles is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine, Surgery and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 54 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (15 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations), Epidemiology (264 citations), Health Information Management (16 citations), Emergency Medicine (17 citations) and Internal Medicine (7 citations). Lee A. Pyles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include James H. Moller, Stanley Einzig, John L. Bass, Christine B. Hills, William A. Neal, John E. Foker, James M. Berry, Jane F. Knapp, Charles J. Mullett and Robert A. Gustafson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, PEDIATRICS, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, JAMA Network Open and American Journal of Perinatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact