Emily Marshman

1.5k total citations
46 papers, 949 citations indexed

About

Emily Marshman is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Marshman has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 949 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Education, 20 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Emily Marshman's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (25 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (13 papers). Emily Marshman is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (25 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (13 papers). Emily Marshman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Emily Marshman's co-authors include Chandralekha Singh, Z. Yasemin Kalender, Timothy J. Nokes‐Malach, Christian D. Schunn, Lisa B. Limeri, Laura Betancur, Susie Chen, Omid Fotuhi, Kevin R. Binning and Nancy Kaufmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, American Journal of Physics and Education Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emily Marshman

46 papers receiving 930 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Marshman United States	15	649	321	287	274	147	46	949
Vashti Sawtelle United States	14	532 0.8×	196 0.6×	165 0.6×	236 0.9×	78 0.5×	40	780
L. H. Kramer United States	16	655 1.0×	210 0.7×	181 0.6×	301 1.1×	127 0.9×	52	983
Sarah B. McKagan United States	14	655 1.0×	61 0.2×	143 0.5×	408 1.5×	129 0.9×	30	949
Maria Vetleseter Bøe Norway	10	411 0.6×	152 0.5×	154 0.5×	218 0.8×	22 0.1×	18	617
Shima Salehi United States	15	456 0.7×	174 0.5×	137 0.5×	184 0.7×	96 0.7×	49	846
Rachel E. Scherr United States	18	1.0k 1.6×	38 0.1×	180 0.6×	664 2.4×	122 0.8×	77	1.3k
Manjula D. Sharma Australia	21	939 1.4×	43 0.1×	127 0.4×	293 1.1×	207 1.4×	71	1.2k
Laura McCullough United States	13	516 0.8×	117 0.4×	81 0.3×	205 0.7×	88 0.6×	72	711
Laurence Viennot France	18	1.2k 1.9×	34 0.1×	160 0.6×	618 2.3×	107 0.7×	68	1.4k
Eleanor C. Sayre United States	13	455 0.7×	71 0.2×	78 0.3×	218 0.8×	54 0.4×	51	582

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Marshman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Marshman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Marshman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Marshman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Marshman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Marshman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Marshman. The network helps show where Emily Marshman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Marshman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Marshman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Marshman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Marshman. Emily Marshman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2025). A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Integrating Conceptual and Quantitative Reasoning in a Quantum Optics Tutorial on Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Education Sciences. 15(10). 1314–1314. 1 indexed citations

2.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2024). Challenges in sensemaking and reasoning in the context of degenerate perturbation theory in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 20(2). 4 indexed citations

3.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2023). The value of using different types of physics problems to help students become proficient problem-solvers. Physics Education. 59(1). 15018–15018. 2 indexed citations

4.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2022). Impact of mathematical reasoning on students� understanding of quantum optics. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 261–266. 3 indexed citations

5.

Kalender, Z. Yasemin, Emily Marshman, Christian D. Schunn, Timothy J. Nokes‐Malach, & Chandralekha Singh. (2020). Investigating the role of prior preparation and self-efficacy on female and male students� introductory physics course achievements. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 275–281. 1 indexed citations

6.

Nokes‐Malach, Timothy J., Z. Yasemin Kalender, Emily Marshman, Christian D. Schunn, & Chandralekha Singh. (2020). How is perception of being recognized by others as someone good at physics related to female and male students� physics identities?. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 415–422. 2 indexed citations

7.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2020). Graduate teaching assistants’ views of broken-into-parts physics problems: Preference for guidance overshadows development of self-reliance in problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16(1). 5 indexed citations

8.

Marshman, Emily & Chandralekha Singh. (2020). Improving student understanding of Dirac notation by using analogical reasoning in the context of a three-dimensional vector space. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 309–314. 2 indexed citations

9.

Kalender, Z. Yasemin, Emily Marshman, Christian D. Schunn, Timothy J. Nokes‐Malach, & Chandralekha Singh. (2019). Large gender differences in physics self-efficacy at equal performance levels: A warning sign?. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 12 indexed citations

10.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2019). Development and validation of a sequence of clicker questions for helping students learn addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 6 indexed citations

11.

Nokes‐Malach, Timothy J., Z. Yasemin Kalender, Emily Marshman, Christian D. Schunn, & Chandralekha Singh. (2019). Prior preparation and motivational characteristics mediate relations between gender and learning outcomes in introductory physics. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 12 indexed citations

12.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2019). Student difficulties with the number of distinct many-particle states for a system of non-interacting identical particles with a fixed number of available single-particle states. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 4 indexed citations

13.

Kalender, Z. Yasemin, Emily Marshman, Timothy J. Nokes‐Malach, Christian D. Schunn, & Chandralekha Singh. (2018). Motivational characteristics of underrepresented ethnic and racial minority students in introductory physics courses. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 204–207. 9 indexed citations

14.

Nokes‐Malach, Timothy J., Emily Marshman, Z. Yasemin Kalender, Christian D. Schunn, & Chandralekha Singh. (2018). Investigation of male and female students� motivational characteristics throughout an introductory physics course sequence. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 276–279. 10 indexed citations

15.

Singh, Chandralekha, et al.. (2018). Student difficulties with finding the fine structure corrections to the energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom using degenerate perturbation theory. 372–375. 1 indexed citations

16.

Singh, Chandralekha, et al.. (2018). Student difficulties with finding the fine structure corrections to the energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom using degenerate perturbation theory. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 372–375. 1 indexed citations

17.

Marshman, Emily, et al.. (2016). The impact of peer interaction on the responses to clicker questions in an upper-level quantum mechanics course. arXiv (Cornell University). 304–307. 9 indexed citations

18.

Singh, Chandralekha & Emily Marshman. (2015). Developing an interactive tutorial on a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer with single photons. arXiv (Cornell University). 239–242. 7 indexed citations

19.

Marshman, Emily & Chandralekha Singh. (2015). Developing an Interactive Tutorial on a Quantum Eraser. arXiv (Cornell University). 175–178. 9 indexed citations

20.

Marshman, Emily & Chandralekha Singh. (2014). Investigating Student Difficulties with Time dependence of Expectation Values in Quantum Mechanics. arXiv (Cornell University). 245–248. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact