Emily M. Smith

529 total citations
22 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Emily M. Smith is a scholar working on Education, Media Technology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily M. Smith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 5 papers in Media Technology and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily M. Smith's work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers). Emily M. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers). Emily M. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. Emily M. Smith's co-authors include N. G. Holmes, Martin M. Stein, Cole Walsh, Brian McKinstry, Aziz Sheikh, Hilary Pinnock, Jenny Ure, Janet Hanley, Claudia Pagliari and William MacNee and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Nature Physics and Physical Review X.

In The Last Decade

Emily M. Smith

20 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily M. Smith United States 10 134 82 60 49 43 22 352
Clinton Smith United States 8 35 0.3× 16 0.2× 19 0.3× 12 0.2× 27 0.6× 23 279
Urs Moser Switzerland 13 209 1.6× 4 0.0× 54 0.9× 52 1.1× 19 0.4× 34 719
Eun-Young Choi South Korea 9 186 1.4× 4 0.0× 21 0.3× 8 0.2× 47 1.1× 35 484
John C. Griffith United States 9 122 0.9× 25 0.3× 24 0.4× 45 1.0× 30 285
Ken Brown United States 12 99 0.7× 16 0.2× 19 0.3× 5 0.1× 8 0.2× 63 531
Jason E. Dowd United States 8 201 1.5× 45 0.5× 87 1.4× 6 0.1× 10 372
Barbara Edwards United States 9 269 2.0× 17 0.2× 42 0.7× 2 0.0× 20 0.5× 32 394
Erik Brogt New Zealand 12 171 1.3× 17 0.2× 29 0.5× 23 0.5× 54 452
Antje Kohnle United Kingdom 11 175 1.3× 67 0.8× 89 1.5× 2 0.0× 1 0.0× 31 345

Countries citing papers authored by Emily M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily M. Smith. The network helps show where Emily M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily M. Smith. Emily M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pilloud, Marin A., et al.. (2024). Estimation of sex assigned at birth using dental crown and cervical measurements in a modern global sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 69(6). 1996–2008. 2 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Emily M., et al.. (2021). Investigating relationships between emotional states and self-efficacy, agency, and interest in introductory labs. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 209–214.
3.
Walsh, Cole, et al.. (2021). Exploring the effects of omitted variable bias in physics education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 17(1). 12 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Emily M. & N. G. Holmes. (2021). Best practice for instructional labs. Nature Physics. 17(6). 662–663. 37 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Emily M., et al.. (2020). Context of authority may affect students� evaluations of measurement. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 554–559. 1 indexed citations
6.
McGill, Kathryn L., et al.. (2020). Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16(1). 40 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Emily M., Martin M. Stein, & N. G. Holmes. (2020). How expectations of confirmation influence students’ experimentation decisions in introductory labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16(1). 18 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Emily M. & N. G. Holmes. (2020). �Let�s just pretend�: Students� shifts in frames during a content-reinforcement lab. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 484–489. 2 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Emily M., Martin M. Stein, Cole Walsh, & N. G. Holmes. (2020). Direct Measurement of the Impact of Teaching Experimentation in Physics Labs. Physical Review X. 10(1). 55 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Emily M. & N. G. Holmes. (2020). Evaluating instructional labs’ use of deliberate practice to teach critical thinking skills. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16(2). 16 indexed citations
11.
McGill, Kathryn L., et al.. (2019). Who does what now? How physics lab instruction impacts student behaviors. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations
12.
Holmes, N. G. & Emily M. Smith. (2019). Operationalizing the AAPT Learning Goals for the Lab. The Physics Teacher. 57(5). 296–299. 27 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Emily M., Justyna P. Zwolak, & Corinne A. Manogue. (2019). Isolating approaches: How middle-division physics students coordinate forms and representations in complex algebra. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 15(1). 4 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Emily M., Justyna P. Zwolak, & Corinne A. Manogue. (2015). Student difficulties with complex numbers. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 311–314. 3 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Emily M., Joanna M. Rankin, & Dipanjan Mitra. (2013). Core and conal component analysis of pulsar B1237+25 – II. Investigation of the segregated modes★. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 435(3). 1984–2002. 21 indexed citations
16.
Ure, Jenny, Hilary Pinnock, Janet Hanley, et al.. (2011). Piloting tele-monitoring in COPD: a mixed methods exploration of issues in design and implementation. Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 21(1). 57–64. 88 indexed citations
17.
Chojnacki, E., Emily M. Smith, R. Ehrlich, Matthias Liepe, & J. Sears. (2009). DC CONDUCTIVITY OF RF ABSORBING MATERIALS. 3 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Emily M.. (2007). Making connections - ABCs of what engineering schools don't teach. IEEE Potentials. 26(3). 14–15. 1 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Emily M.. (2002). Teamwork with the Next Generation. Mechanical Engineering. 124(6). 46–49. 3 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Emily M.. (1957). Occupational Health Nursing. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health. 47(3). 375–376. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026