Emily M. Elliott

65 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role...20052026201220192005250500750

Peers

Emily M. Elliott
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 751
  • Social Psychology 296
  • Artificial Intelligence 191
Replace Michael F. Bunting with:
Michael F. Bunting United States
J. Scott Saults United States
Richard P. Heitz United States
Valérie Camos Switzerland
Marilyn L. Turner United States
Jan W. de Fockert United Kingdom
Tabitha W. Payne United States
Patrick C. Kyllonen United States
Zach Shipstead United States
David P. McCabe United States
Emily M. Elliott relative to Michael F. Bunting United States Michael F. Bunting's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael F. Bunting · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily M. Elliott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily M. Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily M. Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily M. Elliott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily M. Elliott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily M. Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily M. Elliott. The network helps show where Emily M. Elliott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily M. Elliott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily M. Elliott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily M. Elliott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily M. Elliott. Emily M. Elliott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 1
4 0
5 18
6 2
7 3
8 3
9 23
10 12
11 60
12 25
13 34
14
Attention and Working Memory: Tools for Understanding Consciousness
4
15 30
16 17
17 45
18 113
19 131
20
Sport participation in middle childhood: association with styles of play and parental participation.
24

About Emily M. Elliott

Emily M. Elliott is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (22 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (21 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (751 citations). Emily M. Elliott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nelson Cowan, J. Scott Saults, Candice C. Morey, Andrew R. A. Conway, Jill Talley Shelton, Benjamin D. Hill, Wm. Drew Gouvier, Lara Nugent, Matthew Moreno and Nathanael M. Fristoe. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026