Emily Honig
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Japanese History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 8
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 6
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 1
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 5
- Co-authors
- Gail Hershatter (4 shared papers)Wen‐hsin Yeh (1 shared paper)Xiaojian Zhao (2 shared papers)Rubie S. Watson (1 shared paper)William Lavely (1 shared paper)Lisa Rofel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modern China (2 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)The China Quarterly (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Honig
21 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Gender Studies 135
- Cultural Studies 61
- Sociology and Political Science 317
- Political Science and International Relations 162
- Anthropology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Honig
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Honig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Honig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Honig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Honig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Honig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Honig. The network helps show where Emily Honig may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Emily Honig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 160 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 18 | Reflections on the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing and Huairou, 1995 | 1996 | 2 |
| 19 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 2 |
About Emily Honig
Emily Honig is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Social Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (1 paper), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (1 paper), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper) and Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (135 citations), Cultural Studies (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (317 citations), Political Science and International Relations (162 citations) and Anthropology (31 citations). Emily Honig has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gail Hershatter, Wen‐hsin Yeh, Xiaojian Zhao, Rubie S. Watson, William Lavely and Lisa Rofel. Their work appears in journals such as Modern China, The Journal of Asian Studies, The China Quarterly, The American Historical Review and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.