Emily E. Smith

14 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Emily E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 63
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 36
  • Neurology 13
  • Biological Psychiatry 3
Replace Maiya R. Geddes with:
Maiya R. Geddes United States
Linda Zhang Spain
Mar Santamaria United States
Concepción Padilla Spain
Federica Mantovani Italy
Julie Kuo United States
Yaiza Molina Spain
Iolanda Martino Italy
Sussanne Reyes Chile
Rasmus Berggren Sweden
Emily E. Smith relative to Maiya R. Geddes United States Maiya R. Geddes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Maiya R. Geddes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Smith. The network helps show where Emily E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Emily E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201775
2 201726
3 201821
4 202017
5 201615
6 201814
7
T and B cell subsets differentially correlate with amyloid deposition and neurocognitive function in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment after one year of physical activity.
201913
8 202112
9 202010
10 20198
11 20154
12 20074
13 20223
14 20231
15
La práctica del Mindfulness o Atención Plena mejora la salud y la calidad de vida en adultos
20180

About Emily E. Smith

Emily E. Smith is a scholar working on Physiology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (63 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (36 citations), Neurology (13 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (3 citations). Emily E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trey Hedden, Shannon B. Juengst, Kathryn V. Papp, Dorene M. Rentz, Bernard Hanseeuw, Jorge Sepulcre, Aaron P. Schultz, Rachel F. Buckley, Keith A. Johnson and Jasmeer P. Chhatwal. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Neurology, The FASEB Journal, Equity & Excellence in Education and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact