Julie Kuo

498 total citations
9 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Julie Kuo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Kuo has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Physiology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Julie Kuo's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). Julie Kuo is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). Julie Kuo collaborates with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Julie Kuo's co-authors include Michelle C. Carlson, Laura N. Gitlin, Jeanine M. Parisi, Laurel Beckett, John Kornak, Anthony Gamst, Danielle Harvey, Michael Donohue, Hao Zhang and Qian‐Li Xue and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Alzheimer s & Dementia and JAMA Network Open.

In The Last Decade

Julie Kuo

8 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julie Kuo United States	7	149	74	74	58	44	9	308
Roberta Vaccaro Italy	12	205 1.4×	100 1.4×	65 0.9×	59 1.0×	41 0.9×	39	513
Wyllians Vendramini Borelli Brazil	11	173 1.2×	46 0.6×	65 0.9×	55 0.9×	22 0.5×	48	424
Ryan J. Piers United States	11	124 0.8×	62 0.8×	46 0.6×	35 0.6×	24 0.5×	12	353
Ki Jung Chang South Korea	10	74 0.5×	107 1.4×	77 1.0×	73 1.3×	33 0.8×	20	371
Anamaria Brăilean United Kingdom	11	139 0.9×	77 1.0×	36 0.5×	35 0.6×	34 0.8×	11	437
Weihong Kuang China	8	191 1.3×	90 1.2×	70 0.9×	48 0.8×	16 0.4×	20	401
Therese Rydberg Sterner Sweden	10	71 0.5×	75 1.0×	80 1.1×	54 0.9×	15 0.3×	39	349
Sarah Farias United States	11	366 2.5×	52 0.7×	67 0.9×	37 0.6×	35 0.8×	15	533
Lovingly Quitania Park United States	6	252 1.7×	56 0.8×	59 0.8×	28 0.5×	48 1.1×	6	348

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Kuo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Kuo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Kuo. The network helps show where Julie Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Kuo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Kuo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Kuo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Kuo. Julie Kuo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Cohen, Ken, Nathan J. Smith, Omid Ameli, et al.. (2025). Medicare Risk Arrangement and Use and Outcomes Among Physician Groups. JAMA Network Open. 8(1). e2456074–e2456074.

2.

Hill, Terry, et al.. (2018). A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0199961–e0199961. 3 indexed citations

3.

Clark, Scott R., Jeanine M. Parisi, Julie Kuo, & Michelle C. Carlson. (2015). Physical Activity Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Executive Function Impairment in Older Women. Journal of Aging and Health. 28(4). 726–739. 13 indexed citations

4.

Carlson, Michelle C., Julie Kuo, Yi‐Fang Chuang, et al.. (2015). Impact of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 11(11). 1340–1348. 86 indexed citations

5.

Parisi, Jeanine M., Julie Kuo, George W. Rebok, et al.. (2014). Increases in Lifestyle Activities as a Result of Experience Corps® Participation. Journal of Urban Health. 92(1). 55–66. 41 indexed citations

6.

Kuo, Julie, et al.. (2014). A Systematic Review of Strategies to Foster Activity Engagement in Persons With Dementia. Health Education & Behavior. 41(1_suppl). 70S–83S. 50 indexed citations

7.

Harrell, Paul T., Sílvia S. Martins, Pia M. Mauro, et al.. (2014). Cognitive performance profiles by latent classes of drug use. American Journal on Addictions. 23(5). 431–439. 10 indexed citations

8.

Beckett, Laurel, Danielle Harvey, Anthony Gamst, et al.. (2010). The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Annual change in biomarkers and clinical outcomes. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 6(3). 257–264. 89 indexed citations

9.

Albright, Craig D., Julie Kuo, & Sarah Jeong. (2001). cAMP Enhances Cx43 Gap Junction Formation and Function and Reverses Choline Deficiency Apoptosis. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 71(1). 34–39. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact