William E. Davis

125 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

William E. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Ecological Modeling 175
  • Applied Psychology 168
  • Developmental Biology 66
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 42
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 323
Replace Anna Graybeal with:
Anna Graybeal United States
Bruce L. Smith United States
Tim W. Fawcett United Kingdom
John D. Baldwin United States
Margo Wilson Canada
Therésa M. Jones Australia
Virpi Lummaa Finland
Kristen Hawkes United States
Wayne L. Linklater New Zealand
Stéphane Perreault Canada
William E. Davis relative to Anna Graybeal United States Anna Graybeal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Anna Graybeal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Davis. The network helps show where William E. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Davis Line = papers co-authored together William E. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001282
2 2008158
3 2011138
4 2001116
5 201269
6 199262
7 198960
8 202251
9 199844
10 198043
11 198137
12 201535
13 201530
14 201228
15 200028
16 199327
17 197426
18 200326
19 197325
20 201424

About William E. Davis

William E. Davis is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Education, Ecology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 142 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (175 citations), Applied Psychology (168 citations), Developmental Biology (66 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (42 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (323 citations). William E. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joshua A. Hicks, Harry F. Recher, Jason Trent, Laura A. King, Rebecca J. Schlegel, Gordon B. Hughes, Michael E. Glasscock, C. Gary Jackson, Theodore Coladarci and Gordon Donaldson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Personality Assessment, Journal of Field Ornithology and Pacific Conservation Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact