Emily C. Nusbaum
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul J. SilviaRoger E. BeatyChristopher MartinThomas R. KwapilEmanuel JaukMathias BenedekKari M. EddingtonChristopher Berg
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (22 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers)Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emily C. Nusbaum
32 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Social Psychology 713
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 302
- Clinical Psychology 292
Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Nusbaum
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Nusbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Nusbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Nusbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Nusbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Nusbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Nusbaum. The network helps show where Emily C. Nusbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Nusbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Nusbaum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Nusbaum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Nusbaum. Emily C. Nusbaum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 296 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | What’s Your Major? College Majors as Markers of Creativity | 16 |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 182 | |
| 18 | Listening between the notes: personality, listening context, and aesthetic chills in everyday music listening | 1 |
| 19 | Are intelligence and creativity really so different | 7 |
| 20 | 178 |
About Emily C. Nusbaum
Emily C. Nusbaum is a scholar working on Music, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (22 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers) and Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations) and Music (131 citations). Emily C. Nusbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Silvia, Roger E. Beaty, Christopher Martin, Thomas R. Kwapil, Emanuel Jauk, Mathias Benedek, Kari M. Eddington, Christopher Berg, Kirill Fayn and Donald A. Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Memory & Cognition and Biological Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.