Emilie Passemar

1.8k citations
27 papers · 599 indexed · h-index 14

Emilie Passemar

25 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Emilie Passemar
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 589
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 31
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 24
  • Condensed Matter Physics 8
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 6
Replace K. Ackerstaff et al. with:
K. Ackerstaff et al. Switzerland
E. T. Neil United States
Mohammad Ahmady Canada
Sechul Oh South Korea
Kenneth Lane United States
Raza Sabbir Sufian United States
Hartmut Wittig Germany
Andrew Kobach United States
A. Grau Spain
Brian Colquhoun United Kingdom
Emilie Passemar relative to K. Ackerstaff et al. Switzerland K. Ackerstaff et al.'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
K. Ackerstaff et al. · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emilie Passemar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emilie Passemar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilie Passemar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilie Passemar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emilie Passemar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilie Passemar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilie Passemar. The network helps show where Emilie Passemar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emilie Passemar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emilie Passemar Line = papers co-authored together Emilie Passemar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 202235
3 202150
4 202120
5
$$\tau \rightarrow \mu \mu \mu $$ at a rate of one out of $$10^{14}$$ tau decays?
20202
6 202010
7 20196
8 201843
9 201729
10 20162
11 20163
12 201521
13 201441
14 201462
15 2010125
16 20104
17 200942
18 20080
19 200821
20 200819

About Emilie Passemar

Emilie Passemar is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (26 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (25 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (9 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (5 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (1 paper) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (589 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (31 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (24 citations). Emilie Passemar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vincenzo Cirigliano, Véronique Bernard, Alejandro Celis, Gilberto Colangelo, Micaela Oertel, Jan Stern, H. Leutwyler, L. Gan, Bastian Kubis and Sean Tulin. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal C, Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. D, Physics Letters B and Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026