Emilie Campanac
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Plant Science
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dominique DebanneEdmond CarlierAndrzej BialowasGisèle AlcarazDax A. HoffmanNorbert AnkriCélia GasselinAvindra Nath
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emilie Campanac
14 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 818
- Molecular Biology 545
- Cognitive Neuroscience 515
- Plant Science 169
- Neurology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Emilie Campanac
This map shows the geographic impact of Emilie Campanac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilie Campanac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilie Campanac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emilie Campanac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilie Campanac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilie Campanac. The network helps show where Emilie Campanac may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emilie Campanac
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emilie Campanac. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emilie Campanac based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emilie Campanac. Emilie Campanac is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Human endogenous retrovirus-K contributes to motor neuron diseasebreakdown → | 340 |
| 4 | 107 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 406 | |
| 10 | 97 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 64 | |
| 13 | Plasticity of neuronal excitability: Hebbian rules beyond the synapse. | 18 |
| 14 | 91 |
About Emilie Campanac
Emilie Campanac is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (818 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (515 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (79 citations). Emilie Campanac has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Debanne, Edmond Carlier, Andrzej Bialowas, Gisèle Alcaraz, Dax A. Hoffman, Norbert Ankri, Célia Gasselin, Avindra Nath, Kory Johnson and Gloria von Geldern. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.