Els den Os

511 citations
24 papers · 295 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Els den Os

23 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Els den Os
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 117
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Language and Linguistics 46
  • Artificial Intelligence 132
Replace Johan Frid with:
Johan Frid Sweden
Stephen G. Lambacher Japan
Jos Pacilly Netherlands
Timothy A. Cartwright United States
Tina Burrows United Kingdom
Penelope Bacsfalvi Canada
Denis Arnold Germany
Angelien A. Sanderman Netherlands
Chandan Narayan Canada
Margaret R. MacEachern United States
Els den Os relative to Johan Frid Sweden Johan Frid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Johan Frid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Els den Os

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Els den Os's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Els den Os with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Els den Os more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Els den Os

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Els den Os. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Els den Os. The network helps show where Els den Os may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Els den Os, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Els den Os Line = papers co-authored together Els den Os links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199480
2 199737
3 200732
4 198526
5
Issues in Spoken Dialogue Systems: Experiences with the Dutch Arise System
200020
6 198615
7 200511
8 200510
9 199910
10 20007
11 20026
12 20026
13 19995
14
Natural multimodal interaction for design applications
20044
15 19874
16 20024
17 20024
18 20024
19 20003
20 20052

About Els den Os

Els den Os is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 24 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (12 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (7 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (6 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (3 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (117 citations), Linguistics and Language (35 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (132 citations). Els den Os has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Frank Wijnen, Lou Boves, Peggy Janssen, Jan P. de Ruiter, Aoju Chen, René Kager, Janienke Sturm, Louis Boves, Louis ten Bosch and Albert Russel. Their work appears in journals such as Phonetica, Journal of Child Language, Speech Communication, The Linguistic Review and Lingua.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact