Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Russel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Russel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Russel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Russel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Russel. The network helps show where Albert Russel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert Russel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert Russel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert Russel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Albert Russel. Albert Russel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Russel, Albert, et al.. (2010). ELAN as flexible annotation framework for sound and image processing detectors. Language Resources and Evaluation. 890–893.19 indexed citations
2.
Klassmann, Alexander, et al.. (2008). Exploring and enriching a language resource archive via the web. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
3.
Sloetjes, Han, Albert Russel, & Alexander Klassmann. (2007). ELAN: a free and open-source multimedia annotation tool.. Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 87(10). 4015–4016.4 indexed citations
Russel, Albert, et al.. (2006). ANNEX - a web-based Framework for Exploiting Annotated Media Resources. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1552–1555.7 indexed citations
6.
Brugman, Hennie & Albert Russel. (2004). Annotating Multi-media/Multi-modal Resources with ELAN. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2065–2068.280 indexed citations
7.
Brugman, Hennie, Onno Crasborn, & Albert Russel. (2004). Collaborative annotation of sign language data with Peer-to-Peer technology. Language Resources and Evaluation. 213–216.8 indexed citations
8.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Daan Broeder, & Albert Russel. (2004). XML-based language archiving. Language Resources and Evaluation. 63–69.1 indexed citations
Broeder, Daan, et al.. (2000). Towards a Standard for Meta-descriptions of Language Resources.. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
13.
Russel, Albert, Hennie Brugman, Daan Broeder, & Peter Wittenburg. (2000). The EUDICO Project, Multi Media Annotation over the Internet. Language Resources and Evaluation.1 indexed citations
14.
Bontcheva, Kalina, Hennie Brugman, Hamish Cunningham, Albert Russel, & Peter Wittenburg. (2000). An Experiment in Unifying Audio-Visual and Textual Infrastructures for Language Processing Research and Development. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 19–25.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.