Angelien A. Sanderman
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jan Roelof de PijperRené CollierLou BovesErik MeijerAgaath M. C. SluijterToni RietveldArmin B. CremersEls den Os
- Topics
- Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers)Speech and dialogue systems (5 papers)Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaLanguage and SpeechTU/e Research Portal
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Angelien A. Sanderman
9 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
- Artificial Intelligence 112
- Linguistics and Language 46
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 46
- Language and Linguistics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Angelien A. Sanderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Angelien A. Sanderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelien A. Sanderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelien A. Sanderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angelien A. Sanderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelien A. Sanderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelien A. Sanderman. The network helps show where Angelien A. Sanderman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angelien A. Sanderman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angelien A. Sanderman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angelien A. Sanderman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angelien A. Sanderman. Angelien A. Sanderman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 129 | |
| 7 | How can prosody segment the flow of (synthetic) speech | 2 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 3 |
About Angelien A. Sanderman
Angelien A. Sanderman is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Linguistics and Language, having authored 9 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (5 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), Linguistics and Language (46 citations) and Language and Linguistics (45 citations). Angelien A. Sanderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jan Roelof de Pijper, René Collier, Lou Boves, Erik Meijer, Agaath M. C. Sluijter, Toni Rietveld, Armin B. Cremers and Els den Os. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Speech and TU/e Research Portal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.