The Linguistic Review

607 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 607 papers published in The Linguistic Review in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The Linguistic Review usually cover Language and Linguistics (420 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (214 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (198 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (362 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (166 papers) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Linguistic Review are Edwin Williams, Paul Kiparsky, Anna Szabolcsi, Barbara C. Scholz, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Michael Tomasello, Hedde Zeijlstra, Josef Bayer, C.‐T. James Huang and Andrew Wedel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Linguistic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Linguistic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Linguistic Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Linguistic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Linguistic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Linguistic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Linguistic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025