Eloho Ufomata
About
In The Last Decade
Eloho Ufomata
8 papers receiving 216 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Gender Studies 129
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 112
- Social Psychology 101
- General Health Professions 39
- Sociology and Political Science 33
Countries citing papers authored by Eloho Ufomata
This map shows the geographic impact of Eloho Ufomata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eloho Ufomata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eloho Ufomata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eloho Ufomata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eloho Ufomata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eloho Ufomata. The network helps show where Eloho Ufomata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eloho Ufomata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eloho Ufomata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eloho Ufomata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eloho Ufomata. Eloho Ufomata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Mentorship of Underrepresented Physicians and Trainees in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review breakdown → | 115 |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 44 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.