Elizabeth S. Kim
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Brian ScassellatiWilma BainbridgeJustin HartFrederick ShicLauren BerkovitsEmily BernierRhea PaulCarla A. Wall
- Topics
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers)Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersAutismInternational Journal of Social Robotics
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth S. Kim
16 papers receiving 969 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Social Psychology 536
- Cognitive Neuroscience 389
- Artificial Intelligence 316
- Human-Computer Interaction 129
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth S. Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth S. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth S. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth S. Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth S. Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth S. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth S. Kim. The network helps show where Elizabeth S. Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth S. Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth S. Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth S. Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth S. Kim. Elizabeth S. Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 299 | |
| 11 | 298 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 208 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 26 |
About Elizabeth S. Kim
Elizabeth S. Kim is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers) and Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (536 citations), Occupational Therapy (99 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (129 citations). Elizabeth S. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Brian Scassellati, Wilma Bainbridge, Justin Hart, Frederick Shic, Lauren Berkovits, Emily Bernier, Rhea Paul, Carla A. Wall, Katherine M. Tsui and Elizabeth L. Wiley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism and International Journal of Social Robotics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.