Elizabeth Cook

469 citations
27 papers · 296 indexed · h-index 9

Elizabeth Cook

23 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Cook
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Reproductive Medicine 59
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 29
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
  • Clinical Psychology 49
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 18
Replace Sareh Dashti with:
Sareh Dashti Iran
Άννα Δελτσίδου Greece
Alison McLeod United Kingdom
Nadia Khan Australia
Luiz Vinícius de Alcantara Sousa Brazil
Jo Rayner Australia
B Bassaw United States
Safieh Jamali Iran
Pooja S. Parameshwar United States
Alex Mitchell United Kingdom
Elizabeth Cook relative to Sareh Dashti Iran Sareh Dashti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Sareh Dashti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Cook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Cook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Cook. The network helps show where Elizabeth Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth Cook Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth Cook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20214
3 20219
4 202050
5 201923
6 20194
7
The Read-Aloud Accommodation during Instruction: Exploring Effects on Student Self-Perceptions and Academic Growth.
20153
8 201322
9 20132
10 201047
11 20101
12 200826
13 20064
14 200012
15
Light of liberation : a history of Buddhism in India
19921
16
The carnation as a model for hormonal studies in flower senescence
198817
17 19791
18
The ordinary and the fabulous : an introduction to myths, legends and fairy tales
19762
19
The ordinary and the fabulous : an introduction to myths, legends and fairy tales for teachers and storytellers
19692
20 19590

About Elizabeth Cook

Elizabeth Cook is a scholar working on Conservation, Religious studies and Museology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper) and Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (59 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (29 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Elizabeth Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel R. Grow, J. Van Staden, M. Arny, Alexander Knee, Albert Hsu, Jennifer Manlove, Emily Katz, Mehul J. Desai, Tim Davis and Corey Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026