Nadia Khan
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- General Health Professions
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline BoyleCheryce L. HarrisonAdina Y. LangAmanda VincentNalini TarakeshwarKathleen J. SikkemaHelena TeedeMelanie Gibson‐Helm
- Topics
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers)Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyReproductive MedicinePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Khan
16 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
- General Health Professions 74
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 57
- Clinical Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Khan. The network helps show where Nadia Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Khan. Nadia Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer. | 7 |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 26 |
About Nadia Khan
Nadia Khan is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations), Reproductive Medicine (35 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (104 citations). Nadia Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Boyle, Cheryce L. Harrison, Adina Y. Lang, Amanda Vincent, Nalini Tarakeshwar, Kathleen J. Sikkema, Helena Teede, Melanie Gibson‐Helm, Frances Milat and Hanh H. Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Fertility and Sterility and Obesity Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.