Nadia Khan

411 total citations
17 papers, 248 citations indexed

About

Nadia Khan is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Khan has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 248 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Nadia Khan's work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers). Nadia Khan is often cited by papers focused on Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers). Nadia Khan collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Nadia Khan's co-authors include Jacqueline Boyle, Cheryce L. Harrison, Adina Y. Lang, Nalini Tarakeshwar, Kathleen J. Sikkema, Amanda Vincent, Melanie Gibson‐Helm, Helena Teede, Hanh H. Nguyen and Frances Milat and has published in prestigious journals such as Nutrients, Fertility and Sterility and Obesity Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Khan

16 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nadia Khan Australia	9	104	74	62	57	37	17	248
Andréa Cronemberger Rufino Brazil	10	97 0.9×	122 1.6×	70 1.1×	77 1.4×	32 0.9×	33	294
Jordan A. Parsons United Kingdom	12	203 2.0×	64 0.9×	47 0.8×	49 0.9×	50 1.4×	35	304
Raheleh Babazadeh Iran	9	69 0.7×	148 2.0×	29 0.5×	59 1.0×	37 1.0×	36	284
Zevia Schneider Australia	6	114 1.1×	68 0.9×	69 1.1×	82 1.4×	43 1.2×	10	278
Kleyton Santos de Medeiros Brazil	8	45 0.4×	27 0.4×	65 1.0×	45 0.8×	23 0.6×	56	250
Ewa Rzońca Poland	9	111 1.1×	42 0.6×	78 1.3×	27 0.5×	42 1.1×	45	299
Manjri Raval Australia	6	75 0.7×	68 0.9×	74 1.2×	74 1.3×	131 3.5×	8	373
Natasha Marie Kriznik United Kingdom	5	145 1.4×	87 1.2×	117 1.9×	134 2.4×	16 0.4×	7	345
Behnaz Enjezab Iran	13	90 0.9×	88 1.2×	46 0.7×	41 0.7×	70 1.9×	40	371

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Khan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Khan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Khan. The network helps show where Nadia Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Khan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Khan. Nadia Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Khan, Nadia, Sue Evans, Liane Ioannou, et al.. (2023). Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study. Quality of Life Research. 32(9). 2617–2627. 3 indexed citations

Ward, Robyn L., et al.. (2023). Development of a novel and more holistic approach for assessing impact in health and medical research: the Research Impact Assessment Framework. Australian Health Review. 47(5). 589–595. 1 indexed citations

Khan, Nadia, Sue Evans, Liane Ioannou, et al.. (2022). Landscape of clinical trials across the pancreatic cancer care continuum: an Australian perspective. The Medical Journal of Australia. 217(10). 505–509. 2 indexed citations

Khan, Nadia, Ashika Maharaj, Sue Evans, et al.. (2022). A qualitative investigation of the supportive care experiences of people living with pancreatic and oesophagogastric cancer. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 213–213. 8 indexed citations

Khan, Nadia, Charles Pilgrim, Liane Ioannou, et al.. (2022). Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer.. PubMed. 12(2). 622–650. 7 indexed citations

Harrison, Cheryce L., Helena Teede, Nadia Khan, et al.. (2021). Weight management across preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum: A systematic review and quality appraisal of international clinical practice guidelines. Obesity Reviews. 22(10). e13310–e13310. 33 indexed citations

Boyle, Jacqueline, et al.. (2021). Evaluating human-centred design for public health: a case study on developing a healthcare app with refugee communities. Research Involvement and Engagement. 7(1). 32–32. 23 indexed citations

Khan, Nadia, et al.. (2021). Building capable environments using practice leadership. Tizard Learning Disability Review. 26(1). 1–8. 3 indexed citations

Khan, Nadia & Tim Usherwood. (2019). ‘We are not invincible’: a qualitative study of self-care practices by Australian general practice registrars. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 25(4). 380–386. 2 indexed citations

10.

Bacon, Simon, Norm R.C. Campbell, Kim D. Raine, et al.. (2019). Canada’s New Healthy Eating Strategy: Implications for Healthcare Professionals and a Call to Action. 14(4). 6–13.

11.

Willey, Suzanne, Melanie Gibson‐Helm, Tracy Finch, et al.. (2019). Implementing innovative evidence-based perinatal mental health screening for women of refugee background. Women and Birth. 33(3). e245–e255. 21 indexed citations

12.

Khan, Nadia, Jacqueline Boyle, Adina Y. Lang, & Cheryce L. Harrison. (2019). Preconception Health Attitudes and Behaviours of Women: A Qualitative Investigation. Nutrients. 11(7). 1490–1490. 60 indexed citations

13.

Nguyen, Hanh H., et al.. (2019). Identifying and addressing osteoporosis knowledge gaps in women with premature ovarian insufficiency and early menopause: A mixed‐methods study. Clinical Endocrinology. 91(4). 498–507. 29 indexed citations

14.

Yeganeh, Ladan, Nadia Khan, Jacqueline Boyle, et al.. (2019). Development and evaluation of an early menopause question prompt list. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 27(1). 102–109. 9 indexed citations

15.

Khan, Nadia, et al.. (2018). Development of a question prompt list for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 110(3). 514–522. 18 indexed citations

16.

Willey, Suzanne, Melanie Gibson‐Helm, Tracy Finch, et al.. (2018). Implementing innovative evidence-based perinatal mental health screening for refugee women. Women and Birth. 31. S8–S8. 3 indexed citations

17.

Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Nadia Khan, & Kathleen J. Sikkema. (2006). A Relationship-Based Framework of Spirituality for Individuals with HIV. AIDS and Behavior. 10(1). 59–70. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact