Elizabeth A. Prosek
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Amanda L. GiordanoDonna M. GibsonJoshua C. WatsonDanica G. HaysJonathan H. OhrtRaissa MillerSarah TuckerStephanie A. Crockett
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (20 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Counseling & DevelopmentSubstance Use & MisuseJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth A. Prosek
49 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Social Psychology 222
- Clinical Psychology 220
- Sociology and Political Science 147
- Education 107
- General Health Professions 67
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth A. Prosek
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth A. Prosek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth A. Prosek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth A. Prosek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth A. Prosek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth A. Prosek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth A. Prosek. The network helps show where Elizabeth A. Prosek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth A. Prosek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth A. Prosek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth A. Prosek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth A. Prosek. Elizabeth A. Prosek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | The Relationship Between Counseling Students’ Theoretical Orientation and Treatment Outcomes | 2 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Addressing Trauma in Substance Abuse Treatment. | 24 |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Elizabeth A. Prosek
Elizabeth A. Prosek is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (20 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (8 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (222 citations), Clinical Psychology (220 citations) and Applied Psychology (32 citations). Elizabeth A. Prosek has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Amanda L. Giordano, Donna M. Gibson, Joshua C. Watson, Danica G. Hays, Jonathan H. Ohrt, Raissa Miller, Sarah Tucker, Stephanie A. Crockett, Soon‐Wook Kwon and Sherri L Rudinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling & Development, Substance Use & Misuse and Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.