Dominic Stoop

3.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
87 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Dominic Stoop is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dominic Stoop has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 59 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 34 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Dominic Stoop's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (62 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (40 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (31 papers). Dominic Stoop is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (62 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (40 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (31 papers). Dominic Stoop collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Denmark. Dominic Stoop's co-authors include Herman Tournaye, Paul Devroey, Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Michel De Vos, Christophe Blockeel, Julie Nekkebroeck, Greta Verheyen, Michel Camus, Ana Cobo and Sherman J. Silber and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Dominic Stoop

78 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?

2016 296 citations Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Dominic Stoop et al. Human Reproduction profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dominic Stoop Belgium	27	1.8k	1.8k	914	252	159	87	2.2k
Amanda Souza Setti Brazil	23	1.4k 0.8×	1.2k 0.7×	688 0.8×	186 0.7×	131 0.8×	133	1.8k
Cláudia G. Petersen Brazil	25	1.5k 0.8×	1.3k 0.7×	552 0.6×	178 0.7×	142 0.9×	95	1.7k
J.G. Franco Brazil	25	1.3k 0.7×	1.1k 0.6×	543 0.6×	144 0.6×	121 0.8×	106	1.6k
Ann Thurin‐Kjellberg Sweden	22	1.1k 0.6×	872 0.5×	1.1k 1.2×	117 0.5×	244 1.5×	44	1.7k
B. Sandler United States	21	1.2k 0.7×	1.1k 0.6×	788 0.9×	175 0.7×	203 1.3×	105	1.9k
Ettie Maman Israel	23	897 0.5×	913 0.5×	340 0.4×	219 0.9×	138 0.9×	59	1.3k
Samuel Santos‐Ribeiro Belgium	27	1.7k 1.0×	1.6k 0.9×	1.2k 1.3×	129 0.5×	208 1.3×	89	2.2k
Fabienne Devreker Belgium	20	1.0k 0.6×	1.1k 0.7×	487 0.5×	393 1.6×	105 0.7×	44	1.6k
Christel Hydén‐Granskog Finland	16	840 0.5×	785 0.4×	1.1k 1.2×	184 0.7×	124 0.8×	30	1.5k
Jan Peter de Bruin Netherlands	19	1.2k 0.7×	858 0.5×	656 0.7×	181 0.7×	157 1.0×	50	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Dominic Stoop

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dominic Stoop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominic Stoop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominic Stoop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dominic Stoop

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominic Stoop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominic Stoop. The network helps show where Dominic Stoop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominic Stoop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominic Stoop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominic Stoop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominic Stoop. Dominic Stoop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dhaenens, L, Roos Colman, Ilse De Croo, et al.. (2025). Cumulative live birth rates of 31 478 untested embryos from 11 463 women challenge traditional recurrent implantation failure definitions. Human Reproduction. 40(5). 818–833. 1 indexed citations

Roo, Chloë De, et al.. (2025). Fertility in transgender and gender diverse people: systematic review of the effects of gender-affirming hormones on reproductive organs and fertility. Human Reproduction Update. 31(3). 183–217. 3 indexed citations

Roo, Chloë De, Kelly Tilleman, Ilse De Croo, et al.. (2024). P-429 Measuring serum progesterone levels on the day of a fresh blastocyst transfer is debatable as there is no evidence for correlation with ongoing pregnancy results. Human Reproduction. 39(Supplement_1).

Baetens, Machteld, Kelly Tilleman, Frauke Vanden Meerschaut, et al.. (2024). Aligning genotyping and copy number data in single trophectoderm biopsies for aneuploidy prediction: uncovering incomplete concordance. Human Reproduction Open. 2024(4). hoae056–hoae056. 2 indexed citations

Pennings, Guido, et al.. (2024). P-339 Identifying essential information for a valid informed consent (IC) of egg donors: An international Delphi study. Human Reproduction. 39(Supplement_1).

Delbaere, Ilse, Heidi Mertes, M. Condorelli, et al.. (2024). O-109 Reproductive health education: collaborative design of a learning platform for secondary school education involving reproductive health experts, pupils, and teachers. Human Reproduction. 39(Supplement_1). 1 indexed citations

Pennings, Guido, Björn Heindryckx, Dominic Stoop, & Heidi Mertes. (2024). Attitude of Belgian women towards enucleated egg donation for treatment of mitochondrial diseases and infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 49(3). 104101–104101. 1 indexed citations

Boel, Annekatrien, Andreï Rybouchkin, Susana M. Chuva de Sousa Lopes, et al.. (2024). Various repair events following CRISPR/Cas9-based mutational correction of an infertility-related mutation in mouse embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 41(6). 1605–1617. 2 indexed citations

Boel, Annekatrien, Mina Popovic, Petra De Sutter, et al.. (2023). Retained chromosomal integrity following CRISPR-Cas9-based mutational correction in human embryos. Molecular Therapy. 31(8). 2326–2341. 3 indexed citations

10.

He, Honghong, Mengjie Zhou, Chloë De Roo, et al.. (2023). Characterization of ovarian tissue oocytes from transgender men reveals poor calcium release and embryo development, which might be overcome by spindle transfer. Human Reproduction. 38(6). 1135–1150. 11 indexed citations

11.

Croo, Ilse De, et al.. (2023). Live birth rate per transfer is not impacted by the proportion of smooth endoplasmatic reticulum aggregates oocytes. Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn. 15(2). 137–144. 1 indexed citations

12.

Boel, Annekatrien, Björn Menten, Petra De Sutter, et al.. (2022). TEAD4 regulates trophectoderm differentiation upstream of CDX2 in a GATA3-independent manner in the human preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction. 37(8). 1760–1773. 23 indexed citations

13.

Balkenende, Eva, C. C. M. Beerendonk, Kathrin Fleischer, et al.. (2022). Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols. Human Reproduction. 37(8). 1786–1794. 24 indexed citations

14.

Croo, Ilse De, Roos Colman, Petra De Sutter, Dominic Stoop, & Kelly Tilleman. (2022). No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study. Human Reproduction Open. 2022(3). hoac031–hoac031. 9 indexed citations

15.

Polyzos, Nikolaos P., Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Claudia Spits, et al.. (2021). The effect of polymorphisms in FSHR and FSHB genes on ovarian response: a prospective multicenter multinational study in Europe and Asia. Human Reproduction. 36(6). 1711–1721. 27 indexed citations

16.

Groot, Mary de, Eline Dancet, Sjoerd Repping, et al.. (2013). O-160 the voice of Dutch women with anticipated gamete exhaustion who consider oocyte freezing to increase their chances on shared parenthood. Human Reproduction. 28. 66–66. 4 indexed citations

17.

Kyrou, D., Human M. Fatemi, Dominic Stoop, Herman Tournaye, & Paul Devroey. (2012). Is spontaneous natural cycle the ideal method for planning vitrified/thawed blastocyst transfer in normovulatory patients?. Fertility and Sterility. 98(3). S125–S125. 2 indexed citations

18.

Stoop, Dominic, et al.. (2011). Oocyte donation does not affect future reproductive outcome: a follow-up study.. Human Reproduction. 26. 4 indexed citations

19.

Stoop, Dominic, et al.. (2011). First trimester pregnancy loss and live birth rate after ICSI in relation to age and ovarian response: outcome of 23.354 cycles.. Human Reproduction. 26. 1 indexed citations

20.

Nekkebroeck, Julie, et al.. (2010). A preliminary profile of women opting for oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons.. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 14–17. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact