Elias Boukrami
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Anabel GutiérrezBoumediene RamdaniIda Claudia PanettaCherif GuermatFateh BélaïdYusuf Karbhari
- Topics
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers)Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers)Halal products and consumer behavior (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Information Systems and ManagementManagement Information SystemsBusiness and International Management
- Journals
- Journal of Business ResearchJournal of Ethnic and Migration StudiesAsia Pacific Journal of Management
- Partner nations
- United KingdomQatarItaly
In The Last Decade
Elias Boukrami
11 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Information Systems and Management 152
- Information Systems 114
- Strategy and Management 112
- Management Information Systems 111
- Artificial Intelligence 69
Countries citing papers authored by Elias Boukrami
This map shows the geographic impact of Elias Boukrami's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elias Boukrami with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elias Boukrami more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elias Boukrami
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elias Boukrami. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elias Boukrami. The network helps show where Elias Boukrami may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elias Boukrami
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elias Boukrami. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elias Boukrami based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elias Boukrami. Elias Boukrami is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 241 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 |
About Elias Boukrami
Elias Boukrami is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers) and Halal products and consumer behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (152 citations), Management Information Systems (111 citations) and Business and International Management (16 citations). Elias Boukrami has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Anabel Gutiérrez, Boumediene Ramdani, Ida Claudia Panetta, Cherif Guermat, Fateh Bélaïd and Yusuf Karbhari. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies and Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.