Efthymia Nikita
- Archeology top 0.2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- P. NikitasMarta Mìrazón LahrEfstratios ValakosDavid MattinglyCharlotte HendersonAnita RadiniMaria‐Eleni ChovalopoulouKaren Hardy
- Topics
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (55 papers)Paleopathology and ancient diseases (32 papers)Forensic and Genetic Research (23 papers)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyPaleontologyAnthropology
- Journals
- American Journal of Physical AnthropologyJournal of Human EvolutionForensic Science International
- Partner nations
- CyprusGreeceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Efthymia Nikita
73 papers receiving 900 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Archeology 707
- Genetics 259
- Paleontology 218
- Anthropology 157
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 119
Countries citing papers authored by Efthymia Nikita
This map shows the geographic impact of Efthymia Nikita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efthymia Nikita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efthymia Nikita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Efthymia Nikita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Efthymia Nikita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Efthymia Nikita. The network helps show where Efthymia Nikita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Efthymia Nikita
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Efthymia Nikita. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Efthymia Nikita based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Efthymia Nikita. Efthymia Nikita is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Efthymia Nikita
Efthymia Nikita is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (55 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (32 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (707 citations), Paleontology (218 citations) and Anthropology (157 citations). Efthymia Nikita has collaborated with scholars based in Cyprus, Greece and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. Nikitas, Marta Mìrazón Lahr, Efstratios Valakos, David Mattingly, Charlotte Henderson, Anita Radini, Maria‐Eleni Chovalopoulou, Karen Hardy, Stephen Buckley and Les Copeland. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Journal of Human Evolution and Forensic Science International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.