Stephen D. Ousley

2.1k total citations
35 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Stephen D. Ousley is a scholar working on Archeology, Genetics and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen D. Ousley has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Archeology, 13 papers in Genetics and 7 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in Stephen D. Ousley's work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (23 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (7 papers). Stephen D. Ousley is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (23 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (7 papers). Stephen D. Ousley collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Denmark. Stephen D. Ousley's co-authors include Jennifer Vollner, Richard L. Jantz, Alexandra R. Klales, Joseph T. Hefner, Luis L. Cabo, Steven A. Symes, Dennis C. Dirkmaat, Kyra E. Stull, Ericka N. L’Abbé and Lyle W. Konigsberg and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Physical Anthropology and Journal of Human Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Stephen D. Ousley

35 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen D. Ousley United States 16 844 530 176 120 111 35 1.1k
Lee Meadows Jantz United States 17 810 1.0× 485 0.9× 149 0.8× 59 0.5× 97 0.9× 31 1.3k
Ericka N. L’Abbé South Africa 23 981 1.2× 525 1.0× 192 1.1× 95 0.8× 140 1.3× 65 1.3k
Miguel Cecilio Botella López Spain 19 841 1.0× 208 0.4× 207 1.2× 161 1.3× 155 1.4× 107 1.2k
Daniel Turbón Spain 20 659 0.8× 339 0.6× 147 0.8× 295 2.5× 238 2.1× 61 1.1k
Samantha M. Hens United States 16 540 0.6× 178 0.3× 149 0.8× 76 0.6× 104 0.9× 30 695
Dawnie Wolfe Steadman United States 20 737 0.9× 544 1.0× 147 0.8× 132 1.1× 110 1.0× 72 1.2k
Efthymia Nikita Cyprus 18 707 0.8× 259 0.5× 119 0.7× 218 1.8× 157 1.4× 82 928
Alison Galloway United States 13 530 0.6× 265 0.5× 91 0.5× 91 0.8× 77 0.7× 33 885
D. Troy Case United States 17 476 0.6× 271 0.5× 120 0.7× 71 0.6× 66 0.6× 32 764
Jaroslav Brůžek Czechia 20 875 1.0× 314 0.6× 145 0.8× 245 2.0× 160 1.4× 80 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Ousley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Ousley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Ousley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Ousley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Ousley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Ousley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Ousley. The network helps show where Stephen D. Ousley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen D. Ousley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen D. Ousley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen D. Ousley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen D. Ousley. Stephen D. Ousley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Langley, Natalie R., et al.. (2018). Error quantification of osteometric data in forensic anthropology. Forensic Science International. 287. 183–189. 27 indexed citations
2.
Langley, Natalie R., et al.. (2018). Data for validation of osteometric methods in forensic anthropology. Data in Brief. 19. 21–28. 13 indexed citations
3.
Milner, George R., et al.. (2018). Selective mortality in middle-aged American women with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH). PLoS ONE. 13(8). e0202283–e0202283. 10 indexed citations
4.
Milner, George R., et al.. (2016). Estimating Age from Adult Skeletons: New Directions in Transition Analysis Using a Wide Array of Traits. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2016). Skeletal assessment and secular changes in knee development: a radiographic approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 162(2). 229–240. 4 indexed citations
6.
Langley, Natalie R., Richard L. Jantz, & Stephen D. Ousley. (2016). The Effect of Novel Environments on Modern American Skeletons. Human Biology. 88(1). 5–5. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2015). A Transparent Method for Sex Estimation Using Refined DSP Measurements of the Innominate. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2015). An evaluation of sex‐ and ancestry‐specific variation in sacral size and shape using geometric morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 159(4). 646–654. 15 indexed citations
9.
Stull, Kyra E., Ericka N. L’Abbé, & Stephen D. Ousley. (2014). Using multivariate adaptive regression splines to estimate subadult age from diaphyseal dimensions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 154(3). 376–386. 43 indexed citations
10.
Ousley, Stephen D. & Michael W. Kenyhercz. (2013). Geometric Morphometrics and Statistical Classification: Size Matters. 1 indexed citations
11.
Ousley, Stephen D. & Richard L. Jantz. (2013). Fordisc 3. Rechtsmedizin. 23(2). 97–99. 17 indexed citations
12.
Klales, Alexandra R., Stephen D. Ousley, & Jennifer Vollner. (2012). A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 149(1). 104–114. 187 indexed citations
13.
Schmidt, Christopher W., et al.. (2011). Brief communication: Correcting overestimation when determining two‐dimensional occlusal area in human molars. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 145(2). 327–332. 3 indexed citations
14.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2010). Craniometric Variation in the Aleutians: Integrating Morphological, Molecular, Spatial, and Temporal Data. Human Biology. 82(5/6). 629–651. 3 indexed citations
15.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2009). Understanding race and human variation: Why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 139(1). 68–76. 136 indexed citations
16.
Konigsberg, Lyle W. & Stephen D. Ousley. (2009). Update to Konigsberg and Ousley's "Multivariate Quantitative Genetics of Anthropometric Traits from the Boas Data" (1995). Human Biology. 81(5-6). 595–596. 1 indexed citations
17.
Wilczak, Cynthia A. & Stephen D. Ousley. (2009). Test of the relationship between sutural ossicles and cultural cranial deformation: Results from Hawikuh, New Mexico. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 139(4). 483–493. 8 indexed citations
18.
Dirkmaat, Dennis C., Luis L. Cabo, Stephen D. Ousley, & Steven A. Symes. (2008). New perspectives in forensic anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 137(S47). 33–52. 169 indexed citations
19.
Ousley, Stephen D., et al.. (2005). Federal Repatriation Legislation and the Role of Physical Anthropology in Repatriation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 128(S41). 2–32. 38 indexed citations
20.
Ousley, Stephen D.. (1998). The quantitative genetics of epidermal ridges using multivariate maximum likelihood estimation. UMI eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026