Edward Glaeser
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Economic theories and models
- Housing Market and Economics
-
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Papers in
-
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis 2
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 2
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 1
-
- Corruption and Economic Development 1
- Co-authors
- Lawrence H. Summers (1 shared paper)Gharad Bryan (1 shared paper)Alberto Alesina (2 shared papers)Bruce Sacerdote (1 shared paper)Glenn Ellison (1 shared paper)Masahisa Fujita (1 shared paper)Eric Maskin (1 shared paper)Stephen Morris (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Annual Review of Economics (1 paper)National Bureau of Economic Research (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongBrazil
In The Last Decade
Edward Glaeser
6 papers receiving 220 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Economics and Econometrics 151
- Finance 30
- Transportation 18
- General Decision Sciences 4
- Accounting 24
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Glaeser
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Glaeser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Glaeser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Glaeser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Glaeser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Glaeser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Glaeser. The network helps show where Edward Glaeser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Glaeser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? | 2001 | 27 |
| 5 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 1 |
About Edward Glaeser
Edward Glaeser is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies and Ocean Engineering, having authored 6 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper), Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper) and Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (151 citations), Finance (30 citations), Transportation (18 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations) and Accounting (24 citations). Edward Glaeser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence H. Summers, Gharad Bryan, Alberto Alesina, Bruce Sacerdote, Glenn Ellison, Masahisa Fujita, Eric Maskin, Stephen Morris, Christopher M. Harris and Ernst Fehr. Their work appears in journals such as Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annual Review of Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.