Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Industrial Policy and Competition
2015310 citationsMathias Dewatripont, Patrick Legros et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Legros
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Legros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Legros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Legros more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Legros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Legros. The network helps show where Patrick Legros may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Legros
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Legros.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Legros based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Legros. Patrick Legros is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alfaro, Laura, Nicholas Bloom, Paola Conconi, et al.. (2018). Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation. Journal of the European Economic Association. 22(1). 34–72.1 indexed citations
3.
Legros, Patrick & Andrew F. Newman. (2017). Demand-Driven Integration and Divorcement Policies. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).2 indexed citations
4.
Legros, Patrick, et al.. (2016). The Value of Entrepreneurial Failures: Task Allocation and Career Concerns. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
5.
Legros, Patrick, et al.. (2015). College Diversity and Investment Incentives. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
6.
Legros, Patrick & Victor Ginsburgh. (2013). The Economics of Copyright Levies on Hardware. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 10. 20–35.3 indexed citations
7.
Legros, Patrick & Andrew F. Newman. (2012). A Price Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration (Revised Version). RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
8.
Damme, E.E.C. van, et al.. (2010). Quantifying antitrust damages : Towards non-binding guidance for courts. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).18 indexed citations
9.
Dewatripont, Mathias & Patrick Legros. (2009). EU competition policy in a global world. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).1 indexed citations
10.
Conconi, Paola, et al.. (2008). Trade Liberalization and Organizational Change.10 indexed citations
11.
Legros, Patrick. (2006). Copyright, art and Internet: blessing the curse?. ULB Institutional Repository. 1. 285–308.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.